Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

James C Fisher

Biographic Data

ID5579412
NAMEJames C Fisher
GIVEN NAMESJames C
FAMILY NAMEFisher
SIGNATUREFISHER J C
AFFILIATIONSSophia Genetics (Switzerland)
ORCID0000-0002-8244-0688
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS5
WORKS AS AUTHOR5
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1989
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX1
  • Charting the Skies from a Moving Earth

    Open Access•James C Fisher•ARTICLE•Critical Analysis of Law•2021

    This article brings the insights produced by comparative legal analysis to bear on comparative legal discourse itself, in order instructively to recontextualize enduring methodological debates taken to concern the “philosophy” of comparative law. It grounds several such methodological arguments in fundamental positions of legal theory and philosophy, reflecting in doing so on the broader philosophical consequences of specific positions, and empha…

  • Gray Areas in Tort

    Open Access•James C Fisher•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2021

    This comment describes and critiques the decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in Henderson v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust . It considers in particular the Court's position on the effect of Patel v Mirza on previous illegality case law. It analyses the enduring tensions between Patel and the House of Lords’ decision in Gray v Thames Trains , which the Supreme Court in Henderson upheld as enduringly authoritative notwit…

  • The ex turpi causa principle in H ounga and S ervier

    Open Access•James C Fisher•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2015

    In H ounga v A llen the majority of the S upreme C ourt employed a test for the application of the ex turpi causa defence involving the balancing of public policy arguments for and against allowing the defence. Although this has attracted some early academic support, this note will argue it is inconsistent with authority and principle. The later decision in S ervier v A potex does not address the H ounga decision directly but strongly endorses a …

  • The Welfare to Work Transition in the United States

    Open Access•James C Fisher, Larry G Martin•ARTICLE•International Review of Education•2000•Cited by: 1•References: 4

  • From Lindeman to Knowles

    James C Fisher, Ronald L Podeschi•ARTICLE•International Journal of Lifelong…•1989•Cited by: 4•References: 4

    (1989). From Lindeman to Knowles: A change in vision. International Journal of Lifelong Education: Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 345-353

  • From Lindeman to Knowles

    James C Fisher, Ronald L Podeschi•ARTICLE•International Journal of Lifelong…•1989•Cited by: 4•References: 4

    (1989). From Lindeman to Knowles: A change in vision. International Journal of Lifelong Education: Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 345-353

  • The Welfare to Work Transition in the United States

    Open Access•James C Fisher, Larry G Martin•ARTICLE•International Review of Education•2000•Cited by: 1•References: 4

  • From Lindeman to Knowles

    James C Fisher, Ronald L Podeschi•ARTICLE•International Journal of Lifelong…•1989•Cited by: 4•References: 4

    (1989). From Lindeman to Knowles: A change in vision. International Journal of Lifelong Education: Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 345-353

  • The Welfare to Work Transition in the United States

    Open Access•James C Fisher, Larry G Martin•ARTICLE•International Review of Education•2000•Cited by: 1•References: 4

  • The ex turpi causa principle in H ounga and S ervier

    Open Access•James C Fisher•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2015

    In H ounga v A llen the majority of the S upreme C ourt employed a test for the application of the ex turpi causa defence involving the balancing of public policy arguments for and against allowing the defence. Although this has attracted some early academic support, this note will argue it is inconsistent with authority and principle. The later decision in S ervier v A potex does not address the H ounga decision directly but strongly endorses a …

  • Charting the Skies from a Moving Earth

    Open Access•James C Fisher•ARTICLE•Critical Analysis of Law•2021

    This article brings the insights produced by comparative legal analysis to bear on comparative legal discourse itself, in order instructively to recontextualize enduring methodological debates taken to concern the “philosophy” of comparative law. It grounds several such methodological arguments in fundamental positions of legal theory and philosophy, reflecting in doing so on the broader philosophical consequences of specific positions, and empha…

  • Gray Areas in Tort

    Open Access•James C Fisher•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2021

    This comment describes and critiques the decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in Henderson v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust . It considers in particular the Court's position on the effect of Patel v Mirza on previous illegality case law. It analyses the enduring tensions between Patel and the House of Lords’ decision in Gray v Thames Trains , which the Supreme Court in Henderson upheld as enduringly authoritative notwit…

Political science (5 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Economics (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · European and International Contract Law (2 works) · Legal principles and applications (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae