Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

James M Acton

Biographic Data

ID5722113
NAMEJames M Acton
GIVEN NAMESJames M
FAMILY NAMEActon
SIGNATUREACTON J M
AFFILIATIONSCarnegie Endowment for International Peace
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS23
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2007
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • The survivability of nuclear command-and-control capabilities

    Open Access•James M Acton•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2025•References: 17

  • Cyber Warfare & Inadvertent Escalation

    James M Acton•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2020•Cited by: 5

    The advent of cyber warfare exacerbates the risk of inadvertent nuclear escalation in a conventional conflict. In theory, cyber espionage and cyberattacks could enhance one state's ability to undermine another's nuclear deterrent. Regardless of how effective such operations might prove in practice, fear of them could generate escalatory “use-‘em-before-you-lose-‘em” pressures. Additionally, cyber threats could create three qualitatively new mecha…

  • Escalation through Entanglement

    Open Access•James M Acton•ARTICLE•International Security•2018•Cited by: 16•References: 13

    Nonnuclear weapons are increasingly able to threaten dual-use command, control, communication, and intelligence assets that are spaced based or distant from probable theaters of conflict. This form of “entanglement” between nuclear and nonnuclear capabilities creates the potential for Chinese or Russian nonnuclear strikes against the United States or U.S. strikes against either China or Russia to spark inadvertent nuclear escalation. Escalation p…

  • Bombs Away? Being Realistic about Deep Nuclear Reductions

    James M Acton•ARTICLE•The Washington Quarterly•2012•Cited by: 1

  • Nuclear Power, Disarmament and Technological Restraint

    James M Acton•ARTICLE•Survival•2009•Cited by: 1

    Reconciling the spread of nuclear power with the abolition of nuclear weapons will require policymakers, regulators and the nuclear industry to take non-proliferation much more seriously than they have to date. In particular, states should be willing to forsake sensitive nuclear technologies where the ‘proliferation costs’ are deemed to outweigh any economic benefits. The long-term goal should be a multilateral, non-discriminatory ban on the most…

  • The Problem with Nuclear Mind Reading

    Open Access•James M Acton•ARTICLE•Survival•2009

  • Beyond the Dirty Bomb

    James M Acton, M Brooke Rogers et al.•ARTICLE•Survival•2007

  • Escalation through Entanglement

    Open Access•James M Acton•ARTICLE•International Security•2018•Cited by: 16•References: 13

    Nonnuclear weapons are increasingly able to threaten dual-use command, control, communication, and intelligence assets that are spaced based or distant from probable theaters of conflict. This form of “entanglement” between nuclear and nonnuclear capabilities creates the potential for Chinese or Russian nonnuclear strikes against the United States or U.S. strikes against either China or Russia to spark inadvertent nuclear escalation. Escalation p…

  • Cyber Warfare & Inadvertent Escalation

    James M Acton•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2020•Cited by: 5

    The advent of cyber warfare exacerbates the risk of inadvertent nuclear escalation in a conventional conflict. In theory, cyber espionage and cyberattacks could enhance one state's ability to undermine another's nuclear deterrent. Regardless of how effective such operations might prove in practice, fear of them could generate escalatory “use-‘em-before-you-lose-‘em” pressures. Additionally, cyber threats could create three qualitatively new mecha…

  • Bombs Away? Being Realistic about Deep Nuclear Reductions

    James M Acton•ARTICLE•The Washington Quarterly•2012•Cited by: 1

  • Nuclear Power, Disarmament and Technological Restraint

    James M Acton•ARTICLE•Survival•2009•Cited by: 1

    Reconciling the spread of nuclear power with the abolition of nuclear weapons will require policymakers, regulators and the nuclear industry to take non-proliferation much more seriously than they have to date. In particular, states should be willing to forsake sensitive nuclear technologies where the ‘proliferation costs’ are deemed to outweigh any economic benefits. The long-term goal should be a multilateral, non-discriminatory ban on the most…

  • Beyond the Dirty Bomb

    James M Acton, M Brooke Rogers et al.•ARTICLE•Survival•2007

  • Nuclear Power, Disarmament and Technological Restraint

    James M Acton•ARTICLE•Survival•2009•Cited by: 1

    Reconciling the spread of nuclear power with the abolition of nuclear weapons will require policymakers, regulators and the nuclear industry to take non-proliferation much more seriously than they have to date. In particular, states should be willing to forsake sensitive nuclear technologies where the ‘proliferation costs’ are deemed to outweigh any economic benefits. The long-term goal should be a multilateral, non-discriminatory ban on the most…

  • The Problem with Nuclear Mind Reading

    Open Access•James M Acton•ARTICLE•Survival•2009

  • Bombs Away? Being Realistic about Deep Nuclear Reductions

    James M Acton•ARTICLE•The Washington Quarterly•2012•Cited by: 1

  • Escalation through Entanglement

    Open Access•James M Acton•ARTICLE•International Security•2018•Cited by: 16•References: 13

    Nonnuclear weapons are increasingly able to threaten dual-use command, control, communication, and intelligence assets that are spaced based or distant from probable theaters of conflict. This form of “entanglement” between nuclear and nonnuclear capabilities creates the potential for Chinese or Russian nonnuclear strikes against the United States or U.S. strikes against either China or Russia to spark inadvertent nuclear escalation. Escalation p…

  • Cyber Warfare & Inadvertent Escalation

    James M Acton•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2020•Cited by: 5

    The advent of cyber warfare exacerbates the risk of inadvertent nuclear escalation in a conventional conflict. In theory, cyber espionage and cyberattacks could enhance one state's ability to undermine another's nuclear deterrent. Regardless of how effective such operations might prove in practice, fear of them could generate escalatory “use-‘em-before-you-lose-‘em” pressures. Additionally, cyber threats could create three qualitatively new mecha…

  • The survivability of nuclear command-and-control capabilities

    Open Access•James M Acton•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2025•References: 17

Law (7 works) · Law (7 works) · Nuclear Issues and Defense (7 works) · Political science (7 works) · Nuclear weapon (6 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · Arms control (3 works) · Business (3 works) · Computer security (3 works) · Adversary (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae