H A John Green

Biographic Data

ID5730161
NAMEH A John Green
GIVEN NAMESH A John
FAMILY NAMEGreen
SIGNATUREGREEN H A J
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Staffordshire
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS5
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1957
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1973
H-INDEX1

  • Consumer Theory

    A F Shorrocks, Anthony Shorrocks et al.ARTICLEEconomica1973

  • Aggregation in Economic Analysis

    R Fruit, H A John GreenARTICLERevue économique1967Cited by: 5

  • Aggregation in Economic Analysis. An Introductory Survey

    Open AccessHenri Guitton, Hannah Green et al.ARTICLERevue économique1965

  • Dynamic Equilibrium and Instability in the Sense of Harrod

    H A John GreenARTICLEEconomica1962

    Professor Jorgenson has recently displayed great skill in showing that a variety of attempts to demonstrate rigorously the instability in the sense of Harrod of Sir Roy Harrod's system must be regarded as either erroneous or question-begging.' The purpose of this note is to take up a problem which appears to disturb Jorgenson himself.2 In his formulation of the problem, Jorgenson follows Harrod3 in treating growth at the warranted rate as a neces…

  • Growth Models, Capital and Stability

    H A John GreenARTICLEThe Economic Journal1960

  • Mr. Worswick on the Production Possibility Function

    H A John GreenARTICLEThe Economic Journal1959

    Journal Article Mr. Worswick on the Production Possibility Function Get access H. A. John Green H. A. John Green University College of North Staffordshire Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 69, Issue 273, 1 March 1959, Pages 177–180, https://doi.org/10.2307/2227852 Published: 01 March 1959

  • When are Goods More Goods

    Open AccessH A John GreenARTICLEEconomica1958

    Professor Johnson, in a recent note,1 derives the “ substitution theorem ” of demand theory as follows. If a collection of goods B is chosen when A could have been bought for the same money, B represents more goods (or at least not fewer goods, since weak ordering is assumed) than A. Therefore A cannot represent more goods than B. If, when A is bought, B could have been bought for less money, A would represent more goods than B. It follows that w…

  • Some Logical Relations in Revealed Preference Theory

    H A John GreenARTICLEEconomica1957

    1. Two recent articles, [6] and [10], have applied the powerful technique of relational logic, made familiar to economists by Professor Arrow [1], to revealed preference theory, and Professor Hicks has abandoned indifference curves for this technique in his latest work on demand theory ([4], pp. 18-19). The present paper represents a further exercise in this field, with the purpose of investigating certain difficulties in' articles by Professors …