Pınar Gözen Ercan

Biographic Data

ID5792840
NAMEPınar Gözen Ercan
GIVEN NAMESPınar Gözen
FAMILY NAMEErcan
SIGNATUREERCAN P G
AFFILIATIONSHacettepe University
ORCID0000-0002-6713-1641
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS5
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX2

  • The Responsibility to Protect and Reflexive Institutional Transformation in the United Nations

    Pınar Gözen ErcanARTICLEGlobal Responsibility to Protect2026

    The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) has neither consolidated into a coherent regime of collective protection nor faded in the face of geopolitical contestation. Instead, its trajectory within the United Nations reveals a subtler form of normative evolution shaped by ongoing deliberation, procedural negotiation, and institutional practice. Drawing on the Norm Circulation Framework, this article identifies a neglected dynamic in this process: refle…

  • Reframing Jus Post Bellum

    Vildan Taştemel Kapucu, Pınar Gözen ErcanARTICLEInternational Peacekeeping2025References: 10

  • Turkey's water diplomacy

    Open AccessPınar Gözen ErcanARTICLEInternational Affairs2022

  • UN General Assembly Dialogues on the Responsibility to Protect and the Use of Force for Humanitarian Purposes

    Pınar Gözen ErcanARTICLEGlobal Responsibility to Protect2019Cited by: 2

    Bringing into focus the two formal debates on the Responsibility to Protect that took place in 2009 and 2018, this article identifies the approaches of member states towards the humanitarian use of force by locating it in the UN’s deliberations on R2P. To this end, the article compares and contrasts country statements in order to trace states’ general approach towards humanitarian intervention on the basis of their reflections on R2P. Following f…

  • How can a ‘Responsible’ European Union Contribute to the Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect

    Open AccessPınar Gözen Ercan, Pinar Gözen Ercan et al.ARTICLEEuropean Review2019References: 7

    In 2013, in light of the mass atrocity cases in Libya and Syria, the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European Parliament recommended ‘to reconfirm the EU’s commitment to R2P [Responsibility to Protect] by adopting an interinstitutional “Consensus on R2P”’. Despite such reaffirmation, the Union’s role in implementing R2P remains an open-ended question. To date, the EU’s contribution to R2P has rarely been studied. In our attempt to contribute to …

  • Responsibility to protect and inter-state crises

    Pınar Gözen Ercan, Pinar Gözen ErcanARTICLEThe International Journal of…2015Cited by: 3

    This article addresses a prominent question relating to the nature and scope of responsibility to protect (R2P), namely the situation in Gaza, and asks whether or not R2P can be implemented in ‘inter-state’ crises. Following a two-fold analysis in arguing why and how Gaza qualifies as an R2P case requiring the international community's attention, first the scope of R2P is discussed. Then, the crisis in Gaza is the focus, considering the two scena…