UN General Assembly Dialogues on the Responsibility to Protect and the Use of Force for Humanitarian Purposes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12960934 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pınar Gözen Ercan (0000-0002-6713-1641, Hacettepe University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 313-332 |
| Publication date | 2019-06-07 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Responsibility to Protect (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-984X • E-ISSN: 1875-9858 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/1875984x-01103004 |
| OpenAlex | W2949819451 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
Bringing into focus the two formal debates on the Responsibility to Protect that took place in 2009 and 2018, this article identifies the approaches of member states towards the humanitarian use of force by locating it in the UN’s deliberations on R2P. To this end, the article compares and contrasts country statements in order to trace states’ general approach towards humanitarian intervention on the basis of their reflections on R2P. Following from this, the article examines whether or not states’ approaches to humanitarian intervention have been transforming in the twenty-first century, and evaluates how the humanitarian use of force is perceived in relation to the R2P framework that was embraced by the member states of the UN General Assembly in 2005, and how this affects the future of R2P
Business · European union · Human rights · Humanitarian intervention · International humanitarian law · International law · International trade · Intervention (counseling · Law and economics · Member states · Political science · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Use of force · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Psychology
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |