William J Fenrick
Biographic Data
| ID | 5814032 |
|---|---|
| NAME | William J Fenrick |
| GIVEN NAMES | William J |
| FAMILY NAME | Fenrick |
| SIGNATURE | FENRICK W J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Government of Nunavut |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 12 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2007 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The Targeted Killings Judgment and the Scope of Direct Participation in Hostilities
Journal Article The Targeted Killings Judgment and the Scope of Direct Participation in Hostilities Get access William J. Fenrick William J. Fenrick * * Dalhousie University Law School, formerly Senior Legal Adviser in the Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. [[email protected]] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol…
International Humanitarian Law and Combat Casualties
Targeting and Proportionality during the Nato Bombing Campaign against Yugoslavia
The 1999 NATO bombing campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia relied upon modern precision weaponry and purported to pay due regard to contemporary legal standards, in particular to the requirement to limit incidental civilian casualties. There are no such things as error‐free wars or casualty‐free wars. It appears, however, that NATO classified a wider range of objects as military objectives than has traditionally been the case, in p…
Commentary
The ICTY Trial Judgment in the Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaškić is the first judicial decision to explicitly address unlawful attack charges. This article reviews the judgment focusing on how the trial chamber addressed individual criminal responsibility, unlawful attack charges, the crime against humanity of persecution, and the relationship between the two offences. The author observes that the decision contains little legal analysis but a review …
The application of the Geneva Conventions by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
Selon le droit international humanitaire en vigueur, un conflit armé est soumis à un régime juridique différent selon qu'il a un caractère international ou, au contraire, non international. Cette dichotomie ne donne cependant pas toujours de réponses adéquates aux questions auxquelles le Tribunal pénal international pour l'ex-Yougoslavie (TPIY) se voit confronté quand il doit qualifier une situation conflictuelle concrète. L'auteur examine la jur…
The Law of War
The Conventional Weapons Convention
The author commenced an earlier study of the 1980 United Nations Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons (Conventional Weapons Convention) by quoting the late Sir Hersch Lauterpacht's remark: “ If international law is, in some ways, the vanishing point of law, the law of war is, perhaps even more conspicuously, at the vanishing point of international law ”. He then carried Lauterpacht's statement one …
Targeting and Proportionality during the Nato Bombing Campaign against Yugoslavia
The 1999 NATO bombing campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia relied upon modern precision weaponry and purported to pay due regard to contemporary legal standards, in particular to the requirement to limit incidental civilian casualties. There are no such things as error‐free wars or casualty‐free wars. It appears, however, that NATO classified a wider range of objects as military objectives than has traditionally been the case, in p…
Commentary
The ICTY Trial Judgment in the Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaškić is the first judicial decision to explicitly address unlawful attack charges. This article reviews the judgment focusing on how the trial chamber addressed individual criminal responsibility, unlawful attack charges, the crime against humanity of persecution, and the relationship between the two offences. The author observes that the decision contains little legal analysis but a review …
The Law of War
The Targeted Killings Judgment and the Scope of Direct Participation in Hostilities
Journal Article The Targeted Killings Judgment and the Scope of Direct Participation in Hostilities Get access William J. Fenrick William J. Fenrick * * Dalhousie University Law School, formerly Senior Legal Adviser in the Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. [[email protected]] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol…
International Humanitarian Law and Combat Casualties
The Conventional Weapons Convention
The author commenced an earlier study of the 1980 United Nations Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons (Conventional Weapons Convention) by quoting the late Sir Hersch Lauterpacht's remark: “ If international law is, in some ways, the vanishing point of law, the law of war is, perhaps even more conspicuously, at the vanishing point of international law ”. He then carried Lauterpacht's statement one …
The Law of War
The application of the Geneva Conventions by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
Selon le droit international humanitaire en vigueur, un conflit armé est soumis à un régime juridique différent selon qu'il a un caractère international ou, au contraire, non international. Cette dichotomie ne donne cependant pas toujours de réponses adéquates aux questions auxquelles le Tribunal pénal international pour l'ex-Yougoslavie (TPIY) se voit confronté quand il doit qualifier une situation conflictuelle concrète. L'auteur examine la jur…
Commentary
The ICTY Trial Judgment in the Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaškić is the first judicial decision to explicitly address unlawful attack charges. This article reviews the judgment focusing on how the trial chamber addressed individual criminal responsibility, unlawful attack charges, the crime against humanity of persecution, and the relationship between the two offences. The author observes that the decision contains little legal analysis but a review …
Targeting and Proportionality during the Nato Bombing Campaign against Yugoslavia
The 1999 NATO bombing campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia relied upon modern precision weaponry and purported to pay due regard to contemporary legal standards, in particular to the requirement to limit incidental civilian casualties. There are no such things as error‐free wars or casualty‐free wars. It appears, however, that NATO classified a wider range of objects as military objectives than has traditionally been the case, in p…
International Humanitarian Law and Combat Casualties
The Targeted Killings Judgment and the Scope of Direct Participation in Hostilities
Journal Article The Targeted Killings Judgment and the Scope of Direct Participation in Hostilities Get access William J. Fenrick William J. Fenrick * * Dalhousie University Law School, formerly Senior Legal Adviser in the Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. [[email protected]] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol…
Law (7 works) · Political science (7 works) · International Law and Human Rights (6 works) · Global Peace and Security Dynamics (5 works) · International law (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Law of war (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · International humanitarian law (2 works) · International Law and Aviation (2 works)