Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jeanine L M Skorinko

Biographic Data

ID5880040
NAMEJeanine L M Skorinko
GIVEN NAMESJeanine L M
FAMILY NAMESkorinko
SIGNATURESKORINKO J L M
AFFILIATIONSWorcester Polytechnic Institute
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS7
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX1
  • Understanding Side-Effect Intentionality Asymmetries: Meaning, Morality, or Attitudes and Defaults

    Open Access•Sean M Laurent, Brooke Reich et al.•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2021

    People frequently label harmful (but not helpful) side effects as intentional. One proposed explanation for this asymmetry is that moral considerations fundamentally affect how people think about and apply the concept of intentional action. We propose something else: People interpret the meaning of questions about intentionally harming versus helping in fundamentally different ways. Four experiments substantially support this hypothesis. When pre…

  • Expanding Research on Working Women More Globally: Identifying and Remediating Current Blindspots

    Open Access•Allison M Traylor, Allison Traylor et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social Issues•2020•Cited by: 7•References: 67

    Despite numerous calls for more culturally diverse research on women and work, research continues to predominantly study Western and developed countries. In this article, we summarize 10 critical blindspots in existing research. These 10 blind spots are (1) a narrow conceptualization of what work means, (2) limited access to educational and training opportunities, (3) underexamined barriers to employment, (4) pay inequities and unpaid work, (5) d…

  • Reducing Prejudice Across Cultures via Social Tuning

    Open Access•Jeanine Skorinko, Jeanine L M Skorinko et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2015

    This research examines whether culture influences the extent to which people’s attitudes tune toward others’ egalitarian beliefs. Hong Kong Chinese, but not American, participants were less prejudiced, explicitly and implicitly, toward homosexuals when they interacted with a person who appeared to hold egalitarian views as opposed to neutral views (Experiment 1). In Experiments 2 and 3, cultural concepts were manipulated. Americans and Hong Kong …

  • Expanding Research on Working Women More Globally: Identifying and Remediating Current Blindspots

    Open Access•Allison M Traylor, Allison Traylor et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social Issues•2020•Cited by: 7•References: 67

    Despite numerous calls for more culturally diverse research on women and work, research continues to predominantly study Western and developed countries. In this article, we summarize 10 critical blindspots in existing research. These 10 blind spots are (1) a narrow conceptualization of what work means, (2) limited access to educational and training opportunities, (3) underexamined barriers to employment, (4) pay inequities and unpaid work, (5) d…

  • Reducing Prejudice Across Cultures via Social Tuning

    Open Access•Jeanine Skorinko, Jeanine L M Skorinko et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2015

    This research examines whether culture influences the extent to which people’s attitudes tune toward others’ egalitarian beliefs. Hong Kong Chinese, but not American, participants were less prejudiced, explicitly and implicitly, toward homosexuals when they interacted with a person who appeared to hold egalitarian views as opposed to neutral views (Experiment 1). In Experiments 2 and 3, cultural concepts were manipulated. Americans and Hong Kong …

  • Expanding Research on Working Women More Globally: Identifying and Remediating Current Blindspots

    Open Access•Allison M Traylor, Allison Traylor et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social Issues•2020•Cited by: 7•References: 67

    Despite numerous calls for more culturally diverse research on women and work, research continues to predominantly study Western and developed countries. In this article, we summarize 10 critical blindspots in existing research. These 10 blind spots are (1) a narrow conceptualization of what work means, (2) limited access to educational and training opportunities, (3) underexamined barriers to employment, (4) pay inequities and unpaid work, (5) d…

  • Understanding Side-Effect Intentionality Asymmetries: Meaning, Morality, or Attitudes and Defaults

    Open Access•Sean M Laurent, Brooke Reich et al.•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2021

    People frequently label harmful (but not helpful) side effects as intentional. One proposed explanation for this asymmetry is that moral considerations fundamentally affect how people think about and apply the concept of intentional action. We propose something else: People interpret the meaning of questions about intentionally harming versus helping in fundamentally different ways. Four experiments substantially support this hypothesis. When pre…

Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Action (physics) (1 works) · Affect (linguistics) (1 works) · Collectivism (1 works) · Conceptualization (1 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (1 works) · Cultural diversity (1 works) · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae