Caleb Perl
Biographic Data
| ID | 5911833 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Caleb Perl |
| GIVEN NAMES | Caleb |
| FAMILY NAME | Perl |
| SIGNATURE | PERL C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Australian Catholic University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Diagnosing ideal world objections
Some Question-Begging Objections to Rule Consequentialism
This paper defends views like rule consequentialism by distinguishing between two sorts of ideal world objections. It aims to show that one of those sorts of objections is question-begging. Its success would open up a path forward for such views
Formulating Moral Error Theory
This paper shows how to formulate moral error theories given a contextualist semantics like the one that Angelika Kratzer pioneered, answering the concerns that Christine Tiefensee developed
Solving the Ideal Worlds Problem
I introduce a new formulation of rule consequentialism, defended as an improvement on traditional formulations. My new formulation cleanly avoids what Parfit calls “ideal world” objections. I suggest that those objections arise because traditional formulations incorporate counterfactual comparisons about how things could go differently. My new formulation eliminates those counterfactual comparisons. Part of the interest of the new formulation is …
Might Moral Epistemologists Be Asking The Wrong Questions
Might Moral Epistemologists Be Asking The Wrong Questions
Solving the Ideal Worlds Problem
I introduce a new formulation of rule consequentialism, defended as an improvement on traditional formulations. My new formulation cleanly avoids what Parfit calls “ideal world” objections. I suggest that those objections arise because traditional formulations incorporate counterfactual comparisons about how things could go differently. My new formulation eliminates those counterfactual comparisons. Part of the interest of the new formulation is …
Formulating Moral Error Theory
This paper shows how to formulate moral error theories given a contextualist semantics like the one that Angelika Kratzer pioneered, answering the concerns that Christine Tiefensee developed
Some Question-Begging Objections to Rule Consequentialism
This paper defends views like rule consequentialism by distinguishing between two sorts of ideal world objections. It aims to show that one of those sorts of objections is question-begging. Its success would open up a path forward for such views
Diagnosing ideal world objections
Philosophy (5 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 works) · Analytic philosophy (2 works) · Consequentialism (2 works) · Contemporary philosophy (2 works) · Free Will and Agency (2 works) · Ideal (ethics) (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works)