Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Boris Uspenskij

Biographic Data

ID5934161
NAMEBoris Uspenskij
GIVEN NAMESBoris
FAMILY NAMEUspenskij
SIGNATUREUSPENSKIJ B
AFFILIATIONSNational Research University Higher School of Economics
ORCID0000-0002-2018-587X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS20
TOTAL CITATIONS13
WORKS AS AUTHOR20
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1968
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • Towards the Poetics of the Early Mandelštam. Ja v chorovod tenej

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2024

    Mandelstam’s poem is divided into two opposing parts, in terms of content and style; they are united by the same lyrical subject. These two parts correspond to two parallel narrative plans. In the beginning, the unreal, afterlife world (the world of shadows) is presented, and then the earthly, real world. The first part describes the lyrical subject’s transition from being to non-being; the second part speaks of the life he has left behind which …

  • Jonas, Archbishop of Novgorod, and the Question of the Canonical Subordination of the Novgorod Diocese (To the History of the Struggle of the Moscow and Lithuanian Parties in Novgorod)

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2023

    The present work aims to demonstrate that St. Jonas, Archbishop of Novgorod (1458–1470)—the last independent Archbishop of Veliky Novgorod—was a supporter of the Lithuanian party, and not at all an adherent of Moscow, as hagiographic tradition claims and is commonly thought. In particular, he wanted his successor to be consecrated not in Moscow, but in Kiev (i.e., in Lithuanian Rus’). In this connection, In this connection we consider the questio…

  • Russian gosudar’ ‘sovereign’

    Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Voprosy Jazykoznanija•2023

    In the first half of the 15th century, the word gospodar’ appears in the title of the Grand Princes of Muscovy. In the 16th–17th centuries, gospodar’ was replaced by gosudar’. How did these terms correlate? When exactly and how did this change take place? All researchers, without exception, believed that gosudar’ is the result of a transformation of the word gospodar’, but none of them could explain how it could happen. Meanwhile, these words, ap…

  • A Strange Oath of Ivan III

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij, Boris Andreevič Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2022

    The article is devoted to a strange oath of Ivan III, the Grand Prince of all Rus’, in 1488, registered in some Russian chronicles. The oath is very unusual and sometimes is regarded as heretical. Some scholars even associate it with the heresy of the Judaizers. Was the oath really heretical? Why did Ivan III choose such provocative language? The author attempts to answer these and contiguous questions

  • From a Coat of Arms to a Parsuna (Portrait of Princess Sophia Alekseуevna “in the Eagle”)

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2021

    The article is devoted to the portraits of Princess Sophia Alekseyevna placed in the representation of the two-headed eagle (so-called portraits “in the eagle”). There are three paintings of this kind and an engraving (the latter has not survived). The engraving was made by Leon or Alexander Tarassevich in 1689 (it is not excluded that Alexander Tarassevich and Leon Tarassevich were one and the same person with a double name) while the portraits …

  • Otchich i dedich (‘Paternal and ancestral successor’) in the title of Russian monarchs

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Shagi / Steps•2021

    Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» (Россия, Москва

  • An Enigmatic Form in the Title of Russian Tsars

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2020

    The article deals with the spelling of the word обладатель (‘dominator, possessor’), an important component of the title of Russian Tsars (e. g. многихъ земель обладатель or отчичь и дѣдичь наслѣдникъ и обладатель, etc.). This word was written in the title in a special manner, namely with two letters a, as ОБЛААДАТЕЛЬ. It is demonstrated in the article that the form with double a reflects the sacralization of the Tsar and his title

  • Towards the poetics of the late Mandel’shtam (“Masteritsa vinovatykh vzorov…”

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2018

    The article presents a detailed analysis of the poem “Masterica vinovatykh vzorov...” with insights on the poetic technique of Mandel’shtam. Special attention is given to the Mandel’shtam’s use of metaphors, to the interplay of homonymous meanings and to the polyphonic structure of this poem that unifies different voices

  • On the word “polusonok” (Genetivus pluralis) in the “Grifel’naja oda” (“Slate ode”) by Osip Mandel’štam

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2018

    The article is concerned with the structure and the significance of the word polusonok created by O. E. Mandel’štam. The author reconstructs its derivational history and demonstrates that the word was created for expressing a plurale tantum

  • Syntactic archaisms in colloquial Russian

    Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Voprosy Jazykoznanija•2018

  • Metropolitan Kliment Smoliatich and His Epistles

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2017

    The present article analyzes the two epistles of Kliment Smoliatich, the metropolitan of Kiev, written between 1147 and 1154, and sent to Smolensk. The addressees of the epistles were Foma (Thomas) the Presbyter and Prince Rostislav of Smolensk. The epistle to Foma is well known, whereas the epistle to Rostislav is not preserved and is known only through reconstruction. It is argued that both epistles were provoked by the ecclesiastical struggle …

  • Semiotics and culture

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Sign Systems Studies•2017•References: 1

    The perception of time is culturally conditioned which means that in different cultures time may be experienced – perceived, conceptualized and evaluated – in diverse ways. The distinction between past, present and future seems to be a universal phenomenon, but the relations of these categories may be different in different cultural codes. The author defines two models of temporal perception, ‘historical’ and ‘cosmological’, analysing the concept…

  • St. Anthony of Kiev and the Earliest History of Russian Monasticism (Novitiates in Old Rus’)

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2016

    According to the Russian Primary Chronicle, when St. Anthony settled in his cave near Kiev, people joined him and he tonsured them as monks. We know, however, that in certain cases he did not tonsure the newcomers but sent them to be tonsured by a priest (hieromonk). Obviously St. Anthony was not a priest. Why, then, in some cases did he do it himself and yet in other cases, he did not? If he was not a priest, how could he tonsure people? The aut…

  • Glagolitic Script as a Manifestation of Sacred Knowledge

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2014

    It is argued that the Glagolitic alphabet was constructed as an ideographic illustration of sacred knowledge. The author attempts to demonstrate some basic ideas encoded in the forms of the letters. At the same time the alphabet seems to reveal the acquaintance of the inventor of the Glagolitic alphabet – St Cyril the Philosopher – with Semitic languages

  • Boris Uspenskij and the semiotics of communication

    Open Access•Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati, Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Semiotica•2014

    At the core of this article is an interview to Boris Uspenskij, in which the well-known protagonist of the Tartu-Moscow School (currently Head of the Laboratory of Linguistics and Semiotics at the National Research University 's'sHigher School of Economics'' in Moscow) develops on semiotics and the sense and aims of semiotic research, communication and its central role in human consciousness, semiotic theory and methodology, in general and specif…

  • “Tsar and God"

    Boris Uspenskij, Victor Zhivov et al.•BOOK•“Tsar and God•2012

    Featuring a number of distinguished essays by internationally known Russian cultural historians Boris Uspenskij and Victor Zhivov, this collection encompasses various ground-breaking works appearing in English for the first time. Focusing on several of the most interesting and problematic aspects of Russia's cultural development, these essays examine the survival and reconceptualization of Russia's past in later systems, and some of the key trans…

  • “Tsar and God

    Boris Uspenskij, Victor Zhivov•BOOK•“Tsar and God•2012

  • Istorija russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (XI-XVII vv.)

    Open Access•Boris A Uspenskij, Boris Uspenskij•BOOK•Istorija russkogo literaturnogo…•1987

    In der Reihe Sagners Slavistische Sammlung erschienen zwischen 1974 und 2014 Nachdrucke, wissenschaftliche Editionen und wichtige Monographien aus den Bereichen der slavistischen Sprach-, Literatur- und Geschichtswissenschaft.

  • The Semiotics of Russian Culture

    Abbott Gleason, Ju M Lotman et al.•ARTICLE•The Russian Review•1987•Cited by: 13

  • Les problèmes sémiotiques du style à la lumière de la linguistique

    Open Access•Boris A Uspenskij, Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Social Science Information•1968•References: 1

  • The Semiotics of Russian Culture

    Abbott Gleason, Ju M Lotman et al.•ARTICLE•The Russian Review•1987•Cited by: 13

  • Les problèmes sémiotiques du style à la lumière de la linguistique

    Open Access•Boris A Uspenskij, Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Social Science Information•1968•References: 1

  • Istorija russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (XI-XVII vv.)

    Open Access•Boris A Uspenskij, Boris Uspenskij•BOOK•Istorija russkogo literaturnogo…•1987

    In der Reihe Sagners Slavistische Sammlung erschienen zwischen 1974 und 2014 Nachdrucke, wissenschaftliche Editionen und wichtige Monographien aus den Bereichen der slavistischen Sprach-, Literatur- und Geschichtswissenschaft.

  • The Semiotics of Russian Culture

    Abbott Gleason, Ju M Lotman et al.•ARTICLE•The Russian Review•1987•Cited by: 13

  • “Tsar and God"

    Boris Uspenskij, Victor Zhivov et al.•BOOK•“Tsar and God•2012

    Featuring a number of distinguished essays by internationally known Russian cultural historians Boris Uspenskij and Victor Zhivov, this collection encompasses various ground-breaking works appearing in English for the first time. Focusing on several of the most interesting and problematic aspects of Russia's cultural development, these essays examine the survival and reconceptualization of Russia's past in later systems, and some of the key trans…

  • “Tsar and God

    Boris Uspenskij, Victor Zhivov•BOOK•“Tsar and God•2012

  • Glagolitic Script as a Manifestation of Sacred Knowledge

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2014

    It is argued that the Glagolitic alphabet was constructed as an ideographic illustration of sacred knowledge. The author attempts to demonstrate some basic ideas encoded in the forms of the letters. At the same time the alphabet seems to reveal the acquaintance of the inventor of the Glagolitic alphabet – St Cyril the Philosopher – with Semitic languages

  • Boris Uspenskij and the semiotics of communication

    Open Access•Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati, Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Semiotica•2014

    At the core of this article is an interview to Boris Uspenskij, in which the well-known protagonist of the Tartu-Moscow School (currently Head of the Laboratory of Linguistics and Semiotics at the National Research University 's'sHigher School of Economics'' in Moscow) develops on semiotics and the sense and aims of semiotic research, communication and its central role in human consciousness, semiotic theory and methodology, in general and specif…

  • St. Anthony of Kiev and the Earliest History of Russian Monasticism (Novitiates in Old Rus’)

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2016

    According to the Russian Primary Chronicle, when St. Anthony settled in his cave near Kiev, people joined him and he tonsured them as monks. We know, however, that in certain cases he did not tonsure the newcomers but sent them to be tonsured by a priest (hieromonk). Obviously St. Anthony was not a priest. Why, then, in some cases did he do it himself and yet in other cases, he did not? If he was not a priest, how could he tonsure people? The aut…

  • Metropolitan Kliment Smoliatich and His Epistles

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2017

    The present article analyzes the two epistles of Kliment Smoliatich, the metropolitan of Kiev, written between 1147 and 1154, and sent to Smolensk. The addressees of the epistles were Foma (Thomas) the Presbyter and Prince Rostislav of Smolensk. The epistle to Foma is well known, whereas the epistle to Rostislav is not preserved and is known only through reconstruction. It is argued that both epistles were provoked by the ecclesiastical struggle …

  • Semiotics and culture

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Sign Systems Studies•2017•References: 1

    The perception of time is culturally conditioned which means that in different cultures time may be experienced – perceived, conceptualized and evaluated – in diverse ways. The distinction between past, present and future seems to be a universal phenomenon, but the relations of these categories may be different in different cultural codes. The author defines two models of temporal perception, ‘historical’ and ‘cosmological’, analysing the concept…

  • Towards the poetics of the late Mandel’shtam (“Masteritsa vinovatykh vzorov…”

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2018

    The article presents a detailed analysis of the poem “Masterica vinovatykh vzorov...” with insights on the poetic technique of Mandel’shtam. Special attention is given to the Mandel’shtam’s use of metaphors, to the interplay of homonymous meanings and to the polyphonic structure of this poem that unifies different voices

  • On the word “polusonok” (Genetivus pluralis) in the “Grifel’naja oda” (“Slate ode”) by Osip Mandel’štam

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2018

    The article is concerned with the structure and the significance of the word polusonok created by O. E. Mandel’štam. The author reconstructs its derivational history and demonstrates that the word was created for expressing a plurale tantum

  • Syntactic archaisms in colloquial Russian

    Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Voprosy Jazykoznanija•2018

  • An Enigmatic Form in the Title of Russian Tsars

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2020

    The article deals with the spelling of the word обладатель (‘dominator, possessor’), an important component of the title of Russian Tsars (e. g. многихъ земель обладатель or отчичь и дѣдичь наслѣдникъ и обладатель, etc.). This word was written in the title in a special manner, namely with two letters a, as ОБЛААДАТЕЛЬ. It is demonstrated in the article that the form with double a reflects the sacralization of the Tsar and his title

  • From a Coat of Arms to a Parsuna (Portrait of Princess Sophia Alekseуevna “in the Eagle”)

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2021

    The article is devoted to the portraits of Princess Sophia Alekseyevna placed in the representation of the two-headed eagle (so-called portraits “in the eagle”). There are three paintings of this kind and an engraving (the latter has not survived). The engraving was made by Leon or Alexander Tarassevich in 1689 (it is not excluded that Alexander Tarassevich and Leon Tarassevich were one and the same person with a double name) while the portraits …

  • Otchich i dedich (‘Paternal and ancestral successor’) in the title of Russian monarchs

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Shagi / Steps•2021

    Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» (Россия, Москва

  • A Strange Oath of Ivan III

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij, Boris Andreevič Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2022

    The article is devoted to a strange oath of Ivan III, the Grand Prince of all Rus’, in 1488, registered in some Russian chronicles. The oath is very unusual and sometimes is regarded as heretical. Some scholars even associate it with the heresy of the Judaizers. Was the oath really heretical? Why did Ivan III choose such provocative language? The author attempts to answer these and contiguous questions

  • Jonas, Archbishop of Novgorod, and the Question of the Canonical Subordination of the Novgorod Diocese (To the History of the Struggle of the Moscow and Lithuanian Parties in Novgorod)

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Slovene•2023

    The present work aims to demonstrate that St. Jonas, Archbishop of Novgorod (1458–1470)—the last independent Archbishop of Veliky Novgorod—was a supporter of the Lithuanian party, and not at all an adherent of Moscow, as hagiographic tradition claims and is commonly thought. In particular, he wanted his successor to be consecrated not in Moscow, but in Kiev (i.e., in Lithuanian Rus’). In this connection, In this connection we consider the questio…

  • Russian gosudar’ ‘sovereign’

    Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Voprosy Jazykoznanija•2023

    In the first half of the 15th century, the word gospodar’ appears in the title of the Grand Princes of Muscovy. In the 16th–17th centuries, gospodar’ was replaced by gosudar’. How did these terms correlate? When exactly and how did this change take place? All researchers, without exception, believed that gosudar’ is the result of a transformation of the word gospodar’, but none of them could explain how it could happen. Meanwhile, these words, ap…

  • Towards the Poetics of the Early Mandelštam. Ja v chorovod tenej

    Open Access•Boris Uspenskij•ARTICLE•Studi Slavistici•2024

    Mandelstam’s poem is divided into two opposing parts, in terms of content and style; they are united by the same lyrical subject. These two parts correspond to two parallel narrative plans. In the beginning, the unreal, afterlife world (the world of shadows) is presented, and then the earthly, real world. The first part describes the lyrical subject’s transition from being to non-being; the second part speaks of the life he has left behind which …

Philosophy (17 works) · Linguistics (13 works) · History (12 works) · Art (7 works) · Archaeology (5 works) · Linguistics and language evolution (5 works) · Byzantine Studies and History (4 works) · Classics (4 works) · Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication (4 works) · Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae