Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Martin T Wells

Biographic Data

ID5989591
NAMEMartin T Wells
GIVEN NAMESMartin T
FAMILY NAMEWells
SIGNATUREWELLS M T
AFFILIATIONSKent and Canterbury Hospital
ORCID0000-0002-9750-9529
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2002
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX0
  • An Assessment of Racial Disparities in Pretrial Decision‐Making Using Misclassification Models

    Open Access•Kimberly A Hochstedler Webb, Sarah A Riley et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Legal Studies•2026

    Pretrial risk assessment tools are used in jurisdictions across the country to assess the likelihood of “pretrial failure,” the event where defendants either fail to appear (FTA) for court or reoffend. Judicial officers, in turn, use these assessments to determine whether to release or detain defendants during trial. While algorithmic risk assessment tools were designed to predict pretrial failure with greater accuracy relative to judges, there i…

  • The CIRCLE Care Home Guide

    Open Access•Jolie R Keemink, John Hammond et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2025

    BACKGROUND: Many older LGBTQ+ people still face discrimination in care home settings, and many care home staff do not have the knowledge required to provide LGBTQ+ inclusive care. Despite the availability of valuable resources on LGBTQ+ inclusion, its widespread use in social care practice in the United Kingdom is lacking. To address this issue, the current study presents a novel resource on LGBTQ+ inclusion co-designed by older LGBTQ+ people, ca…

  • A Bayesian Approach to Event Studies for Securities Litigation

    Benjamin R Baer, Martin T Wells•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2020

    »Vielmehr bietet [der Kommentar] auf höchstem Niveau eine substantielle Auseinandersetzung mit den Hintergründen, den Zusammenhängen, der Theorie und der Praxis des Grundgesetzes. Besseres lässt sich von einem Verfassungskommentar nicht sagen.“ Herbert Günther Staaatsanzeiger für das Land Hessen 2018 (50), 1494–1495

  • Empirical Methods for the Law

    Daniel T Gilbert, Daniel Gilbert et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2018

    »Vielmehr bietet [der Kommentar] auf höchstem Niveau eine substantielle Auseinandersetzung mit den Hintergründen, den Zusammenhängen, der Theorie und der Praxis des Grundgesetzes. Besseres lässt sich von einem Verfassungskommentar nicht sagen.“ Herbert Günther Staaatsanzeiger für das Land Hessen 2018 (50), 1494–1495

  • Variability in Punitive Damages

    Theodore Eisenberg, Martin T Wells et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2010

    Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker acknowledged that empirical studies undercut criticism of punitive damages. Paradoxically, the Court simultaneously expressed concern about jury predictability based on a high and variable punitive-compensatory ratio published in an article by the present authors. The Court reduced the $2.5 billion Exxon Valdez punitive award to $500 million and stated: »the constitutional outer limit may well be 1:1.« Our empirical fi…

  • Reconciling Experimental Incoherence with Real-World Coherence in Punitive Damages

    Theodore Eisenberg, Jeffrey J Rachlinski et al.•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•2002

    Theodore Eisenberg, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Martin T. Wells, Reconciling Experimental Incoherence with Real-World Coherence in Punitive Damages, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 6 (Jun., 2002), pp. 1239-1271

No prominent works on this page.

  • Reconciling Experimental Incoherence with Real-World Coherence in Punitive Damages

    Theodore Eisenberg, Jeffrey J Rachlinski et al.•ARTICLE•Stanford Law Review•2002

    Theodore Eisenberg, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Martin T. Wells, Reconciling Experimental Incoherence with Real-World Coherence in Punitive Damages, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 6 (Jun., 2002), pp. 1239-1271

  • Variability in Punitive Damages

    Theodore Eisenberg, Martin T Wells et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2010

    Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker acknowledged that empirical studies undercut criticism of punitive damages. Paradoxically, the Court simultaneously expressed concern about jury predictability based on a high and variable punitive-compensatory ratio published in an article by the present authors. The Court reduced the $2.5 billion Exxon Valdez punitive award to $500 million and stated: »the constitutional outer limit may well be 1:1.« Our empirical fi…

  • Empirical Methods for the Law

    Daniel T Gilbert, Daniel Gilbert et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2018

    »Vielmehr bietet [der Kommentar] auf höchstem Niveau eine substantielle Auseinandersetzung mit den Hintergründen, den Zusammenhängen, der Theorie und der Praxis des Grundgesetzes. Besseres lässt sich von einem Verfassungskommentar nicht sagen.“ Herbert Günther Staaatsanzeiger für das Land Hessen 2018 (50), 1494–1495

  • A Bayesian Approach to Event Studies for Securities Litigation

    Benjamin R Baer, Martin T Wells•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2020

    »Vielmehr bietet [der Kommentar] auf höchstem Niveau eine substantielle Auseinandersetzung mit den Hintergründen, den Zusammenhängen, der Theorie und der Praxis des Grundgesetzes. Besseres lässt sich von einem Verfassungskommentar nicht sagen.“ Herbert Günther Staaatsanzeiger für das Land Hessen 2018 (50), 1494–1495

  • The CIRCLE Care Home Guide

    Open Access•Jolie R Keemink, John Hammond et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2025

    BACKGROUND: Many older LGBTQ+ people still face discrimination in care home settings, and many care home staff do not have the knowledge required to provide LGBTQ+ inclusive care. Despite the availability of valuable resources on LGBTQ+ inclusion, its widespread use in social care practice in the United Kingdom is lacking. To address this issue, the current study presents a novel resource on LGBTQ+ inclusion co-designed by older LGBTQ+ people, ca…

  • An Assessment of Racial Disparities in Pretrial Decision‐Making Using Misclassification Models

    Open Access•Kimberly A Hochstedler Webb, Sarah A Riley et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Legal Studies•2026

    Pretrial risk assessment tools are used in jurisdictions across the country to assess the likelihood of “pretrial failure,” the event where defendants either fail to appear (FTA) for court or reoffend. Judicial officers, in turn, use these assessments to determine whether to release or detain defendants during trial. While algorithmic risk assessment tools were designed to predict pretrial failure with greater accuracy relative to judges, there i…

Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 works) · Damages (2 works) · Econometrics (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 works) · Jury Decision Making Processes (2 works) · Punitive damages (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae