Gil Sagi
Biographic Data
| ID | 5995292 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Gil Sagi |
| GIVEN NAMES | Gil |
| FAMILY NAME | Sagi |
| SIGNATURE | SAGI G |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Haifa |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7101-9927 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Logicality in natural language
Is there a relation of logical consequence in natural language? Logicality, in the philosophical literature, has been conceived of as a restrictive phenomenon that is at odds with the unbridled richness and complexity of natural language. This article claims that there is a relation of logical consequence in natural language, and moreover, that it is the subject matter of the bulk of current theories of formal semantics. I employ the framework of…
The Semantic Conception of Logic
This collection of new essays presents cutting-edge research on the semantic conception of logic, the invariance criteria of logicality, grammaticality, and logical truth. Contributors explore the history of the semantic tradition, starting with Tarski, and its historical applications, while central criticisms of the tradition, and especially the use of invariance criteria to explain logicality, are revisited by the original participants in that …
Semantic Conception of Logic
Extensionality and logicality
Logic as a methodological discipline
Considerations on Logical Consequence and Natural Language
In a recent article, “Logical Consequence and Natural Language,” Michael Glanzberg claims that there is no relation of logical consequence in natural language (2015). The present paper counters that claim. I shall discuss Glanzberg’s arguments and show why they don’t hold. I further show how Glanzberg’s claims may be used to rather support the existence of logical consequence in natural language
Considerations on Logical Consequence and Natural Language
In a recent article, “Logical Consequence and Natural Language,” Michael Glanzberg claims that there is no relation of logical consequence in natural language (2015). The present paper counters that claim. I shall discuss Glanzberg’s arguments and show why they don’t hold. I further show how Glanzberg’s claims may be used to rather support the existence of logical consequence in natural language
The Semantic Conception of Logic
This collection of new essays presents cutting-edge research on the semantic conception of logic, the invariance criteria of logicality, grammaticality, and logical truth. Contributors explore the history of the semantic tradition, starting with Tarski, and its historical applications, while central criticisms of the tradition, and especially the use of invariance criteria to explain logicality, are revisited by the original participants in that …
Semantic Conception of Logic
Extensionality and logicality
Logic as a methodological discipline
Logicality in natural language
Is there a relation of logical consequence in natural language? Logicality, in the philosophical literature, has been conceived of as a restrictive phenomenon that is at odds with the unbridled richness and complexity of natural language. This article claims that there is a relation of logical consequence in natural language, and moreover, that it is the subject matter of the bulk of current theories of formal semantics. I employ the framework of…
Computer Science (5 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Metaphysics (3 works) · Philosophy of language (3 works) · Relation (database) (3 works) · Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 works)