Considerations on Logical Consequence and Natural Language
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21311459 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gil Sagi (0000-0002-7101-9927, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 335-357 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | dialectica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2017 • E-ISSN: 1746-8361 |
| Publisher | Verein philosophie.ch (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.48106/dial.v74.i2.06 |
| OpenAlex | W4309703372 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 8 |
In a recent article, “Logical Consequence and Natural Language,” Michael Glanzberg claims that there is no relation of logical consequence in natural language (2015). The present paper counters that claim. I shall discuss Glanzberg’s arguments and show why they don’t hold. I further show how Glanzberg’s claims may be used to rather support the existence of logical consequence in natural language
Epistemology · Linguistics · Logical analysis · Logical conjunction · Logical consequence · Logical form · Natural (archaeology) · Natural language · Relation (database) · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Computer Science · History · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |