Benedikt Löwe
Biographic Data
| ID | 5995478 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Benedikt Löwe |
| GIVEN NAMES | Benedikt |
| FAMILY NAME | Löwe |
| SIGNATURE | LOWE B |
| AFFILIATIONS | Universität Hamburg |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2002 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Measuring the Agreement of Mathematical Peer Reviewers
We investigate the possibility of arguing for or against the philosophical position that mathematics is an epistemic exception on the basis of agreement data from the mathematical peer review process and argue that Cohen’s $$\kappa $$ κ , the standard agreement measure used for inter-rater agreement, is unable to detect epistemic exceptionality from peer review data
Enabling mathematical cultures: Introduction
Practice-based philosophy of mathematics. Traditional philosophy of mathematics considers mathematics to be the paradigmatic deductive science; its human practices and cultural variations are seen as mere contingent phenomena that belong into the realm of sociology of mathematics. In this tradition, philosophy deals with a deductive ideal of mathematics that results from abstracting the divergent social phenomena away
Cultures of Mathematics and Logic: Selected Papers from the Conference in Guangzhou, China, November 9-12, 2012
Cultures of Mathematics and Logic: Selected Papers from the Conference in Guangzhou, China, 9-12 November 2012
Cultures of Mathematics and Logic: Selected Papers from the Conference in Guangzhou, China, November 9-12 2012
History and philosophy of infinity: Selected papers from the conference “Foundations of the Formal Sciences VIII” held at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, England, 20–23 September 2013
Data and phenomena in conceptual modelling
The distinction between data and phenomena introduced by Bogen and Woodward (Philosophical Review 97(3):303–352, 1988) was meant to help accounting for scientific practice, especially in relation with scientific theory testing. Their article and the subsequent discussion is primarily viewed as internal to philosophy of science. We shall argue that the data/phenomena distinction can be used much more broadly in modelling processes in philosophy
The Formal Sciences: Their Scope, Their Foundations, and Their Unity
The Formal Sciences: Their Scope, Their Foundations, and Their Unity
Data and phenomena in conceptual modelling
The distinction between data and phenomena introduced by Bogen and Woodward (Philosophical Review 97(3):303–352, 1988) was meant to help accounting for scientific practice, especially in relation with scientific theory testing. Their article and the subsequent discussion is primarily viewed as internal to philosophy of science. We shall argue that the data/phenomena distinction can be used much more broadly in modelling processes in philosophy
History and philosophy of infinity: Selected papers from the conference “Foundations of the Formal Sciences VIII” held at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, England, 20–23 September 2013
Cultures of Mathematics and Logic: Selected Papers from the Conference in Guangzhou, China, November 9-12, 2012
Cultures of Mathematics and Logic: Selected Papers from the Conference in Guangzhou, China, 9-12 November 2012
Cultures of Mathematics and Logic: Selected Papers from the Conference in Guangzhou, China, November 9-12 2012
Enabling mathematical cultures: Introduction
Practice-based philosophy of mathematics. Traditional philosophy of mathematics considers mathematics to be the paradigmatic deductive science; its human practices and cultural variations are seen as mere contingent phenomena that belong into the realm of sociology of mathematics. In this tradition, philosophy deals with a deductive ideal of mathematics that results from abstracting the divergent social phenomena away
Measuring the Agreement of Mathematical Peer Reviewers
We investigate the possibility of arguing for or against the philosophical position that mathematics is an epistemic exception on the basis of agreement data from the mathematical peer review process and argue that Cohen’s $$\kappa $$ κ , the standard agreement measure used for inter-rater agreement, is unable to detect epistemic exceptionality from peer review data
Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Metaphysics (4 works) · Philosophy of language (4 works) · Philosophy of science (4 works) · History and Theory of Mathematics (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · History (2 works) · Logic, symbolic and mathematical (2 works)