Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Josh Snyder

Biographic Data

ID5997474
NAMEJosh Snyder
GIVEN NAMESJosh
FAMILY NAMESnyder
SIGNATURESNYDER J
AFFILIATIONSStanford University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS9
AUTHOR COUNT2
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2002
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
H-INDEX2
  • Decision framing in judgment aggregation

    Open Access•Fabrizio Cariani, Marc Pauly et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 10

  • Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson

    Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2002•Cited by: 7•References: 1

    In ‘Corroborating Testimony, Probability and Surprise’, Erik J. Olsson ascribes to L. Jonathan Cohen the claims that if two witnesses provide us with the same information, then the less probable the information is, the more confident we may be that the information is true (C), and the stronger the information is corroborated (C*). We question whether Cohen intends anything like claims (C) and (C*). Furthermore, he discusses the concurrence of wit…

  • Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson

    Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2002•Cited by: 7•References: 1

    In ‘Corroborating Testimony, Probability and Surprise’, Erik J. Olsson ascribes to L. Jonathan Cohen the claims that if two witnesses provide us with the same information, then the less probable the information is, the more confident we may be that the information is true (C), and the stronger the information is corroborated (C*). We question whether Cohen intends anything like claims (C) and (C*). Furthermore, he discusses the concurrence of wit…

  • Decision framing in judgment aggregation

    Open Access•Fabrizio Cariani, Marc Pauly et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 10

  • Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson

    Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2002•Cited by: 7•References: 1

    In ‘Corroborating Testimony, Probability and Surprise’, Erik J. Olsson ascribes to L. Jonathan Cohen the claims that if two witnesses provide us with the same information, then the less probable the information is, the more confident we may be that the information is true (C), and the stronger the information is corroborated (C*). We question whether Cohen intends anything like claims (C) and (C*). Furthermore, he discusses the concurrence of wit…

  • Decision framing in judgment aggregation

    Open Access•Fabrizio Cariani, Marc Pauly et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 10

Epistemology (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Argument (complex analysis (1 works) · Characterization (materials science (1 works) · Computer Science (1 works) · Context (archaeology (1 works) · Framing (construction) (1 works) · Game Theory and Voting Systems (1 works) · History (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae