Gio Batta Gori
Biographic Data
| ID | 6055950 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Gio Batta Gori |
| GIVEN NAMES | Gio Batta |
| FAMILY NAME | Gori |
| SIGNATURE | GORI G B |
| AFFILIATIONS | The author is with The Health Policy Center, Bethesda, Md. |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-9177-4447 |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2001 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Daubert ’s Menace
A sea of ink in a recent Journal supplement1 contains much criticism of the Supreme Court’s Daubert opinion. Most of this criticism is based on the perception that the opinion imposes unattainable scientific standards of absolute proof that would impede justice. Yet Daubert aims only to ensure that testimony proffered as scientific is not raw ipse dixit opinion. It does so by offering 2 primary criteria: that an issue be testable by the scientifi…
The Institute of Medicine Report on Smoking
This past September, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published the report Clearing the Smoke: Assessing the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction.1 The report's leading conclusion is that tobacco products of reduced risk, and especially less hazardous cigarettes, are within technical reach and should be officially endorsed and regulated. The report speaks of unparalleled public health opportunities in tobacco harm reduction and in the abatement…
Individualized or Population Risks
With regard to the “Risky Concepts” focus in the March issue of the Journal,1–3 are we to believe that there is a polarization of population vs individual approaches to prevention, when the two are intuitively complementary?1–3 Or is the allegation a pretext to extol command-performance population interventions while obscuring the obvious perception that any form of intervention eventually touches individuals
The Institute of Medicine Report on Smoking
This past September, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published the report Clearing the Smoke: Assessing the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction.1 The report's leading conclusion is that tobacco products of reduced risk, and especially less hazardous cigarettes, are within technical reach and should be officially endorsed and regulated. The report speaks of unparalleled public health opportunities in tobacco harm reduction and in the abatement…
Individualized or Population Risks
With regard to the “Risky Concepts” focus in the March issue of the Journal,1–3 are we to believe that there is a polarization of population vs individual approaches to prevention, when the two are intuitively complementary?1–3 Or is the allegation a pretext to extol command-performance population interventions while obscuring the obvious perception that any form of intervention eventually touches individuals
The Institute of Medicine Report on Smoking
This past September, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published the report Clearing the Smoke: Assessing the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction.1 The report's leading conclusion is that tobacco products of reduced risk, and especially less hazardous cigarettes, are within technical reach and should be officially endorsed and regulated. The report speaks of unparalleled public health opportunities in tobacco harm reduction and in the abatement…
Daubert ’s Menace
A sea of ink in a recent Journal supplement1 contains much criticism of the Supreme Court’s Daubert opinion. Most of this criticism is based on the perception that the opinion imposes unattainable scientific standards of absolute proof that would impede justice. Yet Daubert aims only to ensure that testimony proffered as scientific is not raw ipse dixit opinion. It does so by offering 2 primary criteria: that an issue be testable by the scientifi…
Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Environmental health (2 works) · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Allegation (1 works) · Argument (complex analysis) (1 works) · Blueprint (1 works) · Child and Adolescent Health (1 works) · Criticism (1 works)