Individualized or Population Risks
What Is the Argument
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11027294 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gio Batta Gori (0000-0001-9177-4447, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 1919-1919 |
| Publication date | 2001-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048 |
| Publisher | American Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1919 |
| PMID | 11726363 |
| OpenAlex | W1974750087 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
With regard to the “Risky Concepts” focus in the March issue of the Journal,1–3 are we to believe that there is a polarization of population vs individual approaches to prevention, when the two are intuitively complementary?1–3 Or is the allegation a pretext to extol command-performance population interventions while obscuring the obvious perception that any form of intervention eventually touches individuals
Allegation · Argument (complex analysis) · Environmental health · Focus (optics) · Intervention (counseling) · Perception · Political science · Population · Pretext · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention · Law · Medicine · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |