Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

J Spencer Atkins

Biographic Data

ID6210596
NAMEJ Spencer Atkins
GIVEN NAMESJ Spencer
FAMILY NAMEAtkins
SIGNATUREATKINS J S
AFFILIATIONSBinghamton University
ORCID0000-0003-2553-1046
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0
  • Do Your Homework! A Rights-Based Zetetic Account of Alleged Cases of Doxastic Wronging

    Open Access•J Spencer Atkins•ARTICLE•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2025

  • Defining Wokeness

    J Spencer Atkins•ARTICLE•Social Epistemology•2023

    Rima Basu and I have offered separate accounts of wokeness as an anti-racist ethical concept. Our accounts endorse controversial doctrines in epistemology: doxastic wronging, doxastic voluntarism, and moral encroachment. Many philosophers deny these three views, favoring instead some ordinary standards for epistemic justification. I call this denial the standard view. In this paper, I offer an account of wokeness that is consistent with the stand…

  • Eileen Crist

    J Spencer Atkins•ARTICLE•Environmental Ethics•2019

  • Have You Benefitted from Carbon Emissions? You May Be a “Morally Objectionable Free Rider”

    J Spencer Atkins•ARTICLE•Environmental Ethics•2018

    Much of the climate ethics discussion centers on considerations of compensatory justice and historical accountability. However, little attention is given to supporting and defending the Beneficiary Pays Principle as a guide for policymaking. This principle states that those who have benefitted from an instance of harm have an obligation to compensate those who have been harmed. Thus, this principle implies that those benefitted by industrializati…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Have You Benefitted from Carbon Emissions? You May Be a “Morally Objectionable Free Rider”

    J Spencer Atkins•ARTICLE•Environmental Ethics•2018

    Much of the climate ethics discussion centers on considerations of compensatory justice and historical accountability. However, little attention is given to supporting and defending the Beneficiary Pays Principle as a guide for policymaking. This principle states that those who have benefitted from an instance of harm have an obligation to compensate those who have been harmed. Thus, this principle implies that those benefitted by industrializati…

  • Eileen Crist

    J Spencer Atkins•ARTICLE•Environmental Ethics•2019

  • Defining Wokeness

    J Spencer Atkins•ARTICLE•Social Epistemology•2023

    Rima Basu and I have offered separate accounts of wokeness as an anti-racist ethical concept. Our accounts endorse controversial doctrines in epistemology: doxastic wronging, doxastic voluntarism, and moral encroachment. Many philosophers deny these three views, favoring instead some ordinary standards for epistemic justification. I call this denial the standard view. In this paper, I offer an account of wokeness that is consistent with the stand…

  • Do Your Homework! A Rights-Based Zetetic Account of Alleged Cases of Doxastic Wronging

    Open Access•J Spencer Atkins•ARTICLE•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2025

Law (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Doxastic logic (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Accountability (1 work) · American Environmental and Regional History (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae