Masahide Horita
Biographic Data
| ID | 6219835 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Masahide Horita |
| GIVEN NAMES | Masahide |
| FAMILY NAME | Horita |
| SIGNATURE | HORITA M |
| AFFILIATIONS | The University of Tokyo |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6987-5898 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 8 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Behavior Assessment in Tunnel Construction
A unified understanding of majority rule, CP majority rule, and their variants
Revisiting J. S. Mill’s methods
In his work “A System of Logic”, John Stuart Mill presented four methods of experimental inquiry, structured into five canons, aimed at determining the circumstances that relate to the considered phenomenon by an invariable law. This study delves into Mill’s methods through the lens of social choice theory and discovers the synchronicity between these theories. Our primary finding is that Approval Voting and the Leximax rule are characterized by …
Sabotage-proof social ranking solutions
Robustness against strategic manipulation is a crucial topic in social choice theory. Under some social ranking solutions (SRSs), namely mappings that yield candidates’ ranking from their coalitions’ ranking, candidates can sometimes improve their own social ranking by strategically degrading the coalitions to which they belong (e.g., sabotaging the coalitions to which the candidates and their competitors both belong could damage their competitor…
Consistent social ranking solutions
The performance of coalitions is an important measure for evaluating individuals. Sport players, researchers, and firm workers are often judged with their team performances. The social ranking solution (SRS) is a function that maps the ranking on the set of all feasible coalitions (the domain of coalitions) into the ranking of individuals. Importing the axiom of consistency from voting theory, we study consistent SRSs under the variable domains o…
Which set of agents plays a key role? An impossibility in transforming binary relations
A Society Can Always Decide How to Decide
Infinite regress lies within every democratic procedural choice. If society members try to select an appropriate rule [social choice correspondence (SCC)] entirely endogenously, they will need an appropriate rule to choose such a rule. However, this should also be selected by an appropriate rule to choose a rule to choose a rule, and so on. This paper explores how to solve this infinite regress. A preference profile over the set of alternatives i…
What Forms the Trajectory of Social Reforms? The Roles of Decision Rules and Communication under Epistemic Uncertainty
Group Decision and Negotiation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
No prominent works on this page.
Group Decision and Negotiation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
What Forms the Trajectory of Social Reforms? The Roles of Decision Rules and Communication under Epistemic Uncertainty
A Society Can Always Decide How to Decide
Infinite regress lies within every democratic procedural choice. If society members try to select an appropriate rule [social choice correspondence (SCC)] entirely endogenously, they will need an appropriate rule to choose such a rule. However, this should also be selected by an appropriate rule to choose a rule to choose a rule, and so on. This paper explores how to solve this infinite regress. A preference profile over the set of alternatives i…
Consistent social ranking solutions
The performance of coalitions is an important measure for evaluating individuals. Sport players, researchers, and firm workers are often judged with their team performances. The social ranking solution (SRS) is a function that maps the ranking on the set of all feasible coalitions (the domain of coalitions) into the ranking of individuals. Importing the axiom of consistency from voting theory, we study consistent SRSs under the variable domains o…
Which set of agents plays a key role? An impossibility in transforming binary relations
Sabotage-proof social ranking solutions
Robustness against strategic manipulation is a crucial topic in social choice theory. Under some social ranking solutions (SRSs), namely mappings that yield candidates’ ranking from their coalitions’ ranking, candidates can sometimes improve their own social ranking by strategically degrading the coalitions to which they belong (e.g., sabotaging the coalitions to which the candidates and their competitors both belong could damage their competitor…
Behavior Assessment in Tunnel Construction
A unified understanding of majority rule, CP majority rule, and their variants
Revisiting J. S. Mill’s methods
In his work “A System of Logic”, John Stuart Mill presented four methods of experimental inquiry, structured into five canons, aimed at determining the circumstances that relate to the considered phenomenon by an invariable law. This study delves into Mill’s methods through the lens of social choice theory and discovers the synchronicity between these theories. Our primary finding is that Approval Voting and the Leximax rule are characterized by …
Computer Science (6 works) · Mathematical economics (6 works) · Economics (5 works) · Game Theory and Voting Systems (5 works) · Artificial Intelligence (4 works) · Game Theory and Applications (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Social choice theory (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works)