Michael Zwicky Hauschild
Biographic Data
| ID | 6275725 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Michael Zwicky Hauschild |
| GIVEN NAMES | Michael Zwicky |
| FAMILY NAME | Hauschild |
| SIGNATURE | HAUSCHILD M Z |
| AFFILIATIONS | Technical University of Denmark |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-8331-7390 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 29 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 20 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 29 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1998 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Bridging Global Sustainability Objectives With Corporate Reporting Standards
Given the complexity of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), aligning corporate sustainability with them can be challenging. Drawing on systems thinking, this study examines how the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) align with the SDGs and bridge macro‐level global goals with firm‐level metrics. The analysis revealed 429 of 1009 ESRS data points correspond with 71 of 248 SDG indicators, demonstrating the potential to enhance…
Beyond net zero climate targets
Recent years have seen a wave of net zero targets for greenhouse gas emissions. These represent translations of the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to well below 2 °C to targets for central actors, such as countries, cities and companies. Net zero climate targets hold the potential of a paradigm shift in how individual actors pursue sustainability, away from incremental improvements and towards sufficient reductions in environment…
Evaluating prospective environmental impacts and market integration for enzymatic sugar beet pulp treatment against planetary boundaries
Modern enzymatic biorefineries present promising potential for global decarbonization, offering value-added products from biological resources. However, their role within a sustainable societal trajectory remains unclear, particularly when evaluated against prospective environmental boundaries. This uncertainty stems from the lack of a robust methodology for allocating future impacts to biorefinery products. To bridge this gap, this study present…
Advancing absolute environmental sustainability assessment
Approaches for aggregating data from the regional to the global level
A number of initiatives attempt to delimit the safe operating space (SOS) for human pressures on the Earth system, including the Planetary Boundaries framework. In some cases, data describing regional status are spatially aggregated to provide a global assessment. Several aggregation approaches can be observed, and the chosen approach may impact the conclusions. This study systematically reviews approaches of aggregating regional environmental bo…
Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets
With the growing urgency of addressing climate change it is increasingly important that decision makers at all levels are equipped to take efficient mitigation actions. This research evaluates the potential of four mitigation strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the building stock based on a case study, and these are further evaluated in terms of alignment with the remaining global emission budget and the planetary boundary for glob…
Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe
Advanced technologies are inherently dependent on critical minerals and their related metals. The mining extraction of these critical minerals leads to significant social and environmental impacts that extend beyond the regions where those advanced technologies are ultimately used. This study explores the global socio-environmental challenges arising from the European Climate Law's aim for net-zero greenhouse emissions by 2050, focusing on the EU…
Reflecting the importance of human needs fulfilment in absolute sustainability assessments
Absolute environmental sustainability assessments (AESAs) evaluate whether the environmental impact of a product system is within its share of a safe operating space as determined by biophysical sustainability limits such as the planetary boundaries (PBs). The choice of sharing principle has significant influence on the result of an AESA, and any studies call for further research on how to share the safe operating space in an operational way that…
Pathways to sustainable plastics
Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities
We submit that the safe operating space of the planetary boundary of novel entities is exceeded since annual production and releases are increasing at a pace that outstrips the global capacity for assessment and monitoring. The novel entities boundary in the planetary boundaries framework refers to entities that are novel in a geological sense and that could have large-scale impacts that threaten the integrity of Earth system processes. We review…
Identification of dissipative emissions for improved assessment of metal resources in life cycle assessment
Environmental dissipation is a novel approach to account for impacts from mineral resources. In contrast to all other resource‐related life cycle impact assessment methods, which use data on extractions as input to calculation of indicator scores, environmental dissipation is characterized solely through emissions to the environment. Making environmental dissipation work as a viable resource use impact category in life cycle assessment requires, …
Sharing the safe operating space
In the light of increasing human pressures on the Earth system, the issue of sharing in the face of scarcity is more pressing than ever. The planetary boundary framework identifies and quantifies nine environmental boundaries and corresponding human pressures. However, when aiming to make the concept operational for decision support it is unclear how this safe operating space (SOS) within each of the planetary boundaries should be shared. This st…
Absolute environmental sustainability assessment of a Danish utility company relative to the Planetary Boundaries
Increasing environmental pressure from production and consumption of products and services is starting to affect Earth System stability. Thus, the Planetary Boundaries framework introduced a set of absolute boundaries for keeping the Earth System stable and delimiting a safe operating space for humanity. The sum of environmental pressures associated with human activities should not exceed the safe operating space. This includes utility companies …
Lc‐impact
Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is a lively field of research, and data and models are continuously improved in terms of impact pathways covered, reliability, and spatial detail. However, many of these advancements are scattered throughout the scientific literature, making it difficult for practitioners to apply the new models. Here, we present the LC-IMPACT method that provides characterization factors at the damage level for 11 impact categ…
Addressing environmental sustainability of biochemicals
A Framework for Development and Communication of Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment Methods
An absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA) addresses whether a production or consumption activity can be considered environmentally sustainable in an absolute sense. This involves a comparison of its environmental pressure to its allocated environmental carrying capacity. AESA methods have been developed in multiple academic fields, each using their own set of concepts and terms with little communication across the fields. A recen…
Environmental sustainable decision making– The need and obstacles for integration of LCA into decision analysis
Pursuing necessary reductions in embedded GHG emissions of developed nations
Combining Eco‐Efficiency and Eco‐Effectiveness for Continuous Loop Beverage Packaging Systems
Eco‐efficiency (i.e., increasing value while reducing resource use and pollution) can with advantage be combined with eco‐effectiveness (i.e., maximizing the benefits to ecological and economical systems) to address the challenges posed by the circular economy in the design of circular industrial systems. We present a framework combining life cycle assessment (LCA) and the Cradle to Cradle® (C2C) certification program for the development of conti…
Surveying the Environmental Footprint of Urban Food Consumption
Assessments of urban metabolism (UM) are well situated to identify the scale, components, and direction of urban and energy flows in cities and have been instrumental in benchmarking and monitoring the key levers of urban environmental pressure, such as transport, space conditioning, and electricity. Hitherto, urban food consumption has garnered scant attention both in UM accounting (typically lumped with “biomass”) and on the urban policy agenda…
Response to Comment on “Weighting and Aggregation in Life Cycle Assessment
We are pleased to take this opportunity to respond to Mr. Seager's and Ms. Prado's comment on our article “Weighting and Aggregation in Life Cycle Assessment: Do Present Aggregated Single Scores Provide Correct Decision Support?” (Kalbar et al. 2016). This will provide us an obviously needed opportunity to further clarify our thoughts and points of view on the issue of weighting and aggregation in life cycle assessment (LCA) and some of the conce…
Weighting and Aggregation in Life Cycle Assessment
This study investigates the prevailing practice of obtaining single scores in life cycle assessment (LCA) and identifies potential lacunas in impact assessment methodology related to the results of aggregation into endpoints and single scores. In order to conduct this investigation, a detailed approach was adopted to facilitate identification of three main problems related to the single‐score calculation approach. The prevailing ReCiPe single‐sco…
Confronting Uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment Used for Decision Support
The aim of this article is to help confront uncertainty in life cycle assessments (LCAs) used for decision support. LCAs offer a quantitative approach to assess environmental effects of products, technologies, and services and are conducted by an LCA practitioner or analyst (AN) to support the decision maker (DM) in making the best possible choice for the environment. At present, some DMs do not trust the LCA to be a reliable decision‐support too…
Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Manufacturing
Absolute versus Relative Environmental Sustainability
The cradle‐to‐cradle (C2C) concept has emerged as an alternative to the more established eco‐efficiency concept based on life cycle assessment (LCA). The two concepts differ fundamentally in that eco‐efficiency aims to reduce the negative environmental footprint of human activities while C2C attempts to increase the positive footprint. This article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each concept and suggests how they may learn from each ot…
Pursuing necessary reductions in embedded GHG emissions of developed nations
Life cycle impact assessment and risk assessment of chemicals — a methodological comparison
Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe
Advanced technologies are inherently dependent on critical minerals and their related metals. The mining extraction of these critical minerals leads to significant social and environmental impacts that extend beyond the regions where those advanced technologies are ultimately used. This study explores the global socio-environmental challenges arising from the European Climate Law's aim for net-zero greenhouse emissions by 2050, focusing on the EU…
Environmental sustainable decision making– The need and obstacles for integration of LCA into decision analysis
Pathways to sustainable plastics
Site‐Dependent Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment of Acidification
The lack of spatial differentiation in current life‐cycle impact assessment (LCIA) affects the relevance of the assessed impact. This article first describes a framework for constructing factors relating the region of emission to the acidifying impact on its deposition areas. Next, these factors are established for 44 European regions with the help of the RAINS model, an integrated assessment model that combines information on regional emission l…
Life cycle impact assessment and risk assessment of chemicals — a methodological comparison
Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment
Absolute versus Relative Environmental Sustainability
The cradle‐to‐cradle (C2C) concept has emerged as an alternative to the more established eco‐efficiency concept based on life cycle assessment (LCA). The two concepts differ fundamentally in that eco‐efficiency aims to reduce the negative environmental footprint of human activities while C2C attempts to increase the positive footprint. This article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each concept and suggests how they may learn from each ot…
Quantification of urban metabolism through coupling with the life cycle assessment framework
Cities now consume resources and produce waste in amounts that are incommensurate with the populations they contain. Quantifying and benchmarking the environmental impacts of cities is essential if urbanization of the world’s growing population is to occur sustainably. Urban metabolism (UM) is a promising assessment form in that it provides the annual sum material and energy inputs, and the resultant emissions of the emergent infrastructural need…
Confronting Uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment Used for Decision Support
The aim of this article is to help confront uncertainty in life cycle assessments (LCAs) used for decision support. LCAs offer a quantitative approach to assess environmental effects of products, technologies, and services and are conducted by an LCA practitioner or analyst (AN) to support the decision maker (DM) in making the best possible choice for the environment. At present, some DMs do not trust the LCA to be a reliable decision‐support too…
Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Manufacturing
Combining Eco‐Efficiency and Eco‐Effectiveness for Continuous Loop Beverage Packaging Systems
Eco‐efficiency (i.e., increasing value while reducing resource use and pollution) can with advantage be combined with eco‐effectiveness (i.e., maximizing the benefits to ecological and economical systems) to address the challenges posed by the circular economy in the design of circular industrial systems. We present a framework combining life cycle assessment (LCA) and the Cradle to Cradle® (C2C) certification program for the development of conti…
Surveying the Environmental Footprint of Urban Food Consumption
Assessments of urban metabolism (UM) are well situated to identify the scale, components, and direction of urban and energy flows in cities and have been instrumental in benchmarking and monitoring the key levers of urban environmental pressure, such as transport, space conditioning, and electricity. Hitherto, urban food consumption has garnered scant attention both in UM accounting (typically lumped with “biomass”) and on the urban policy agenda…
Response to Comment on “Weighting and Aggregation in Life Cycle Assessment
We are pleased to take this opportunity to respond to Mr. Seager's and Ms. Prado's comment on our article “Weighting and Aggregation in Life Cycle Assessment: Do Present Aggregated Single Scores Provide Correct Decision Support?” (Kalbar et al. 2016). This will provide us an obviously needed opportunity to further clarify our thoughts and points of view on the issue of weighting and aggregation in life cycle assessment (LCA) and some of the conce…
Weighting and Aggregation in Life Cycle Assessment
This study investigates the prevailing practice of obtaining single scores in life cycle assessment (LCA) and identifies potential lacunas in impact assessment methodology related to the results of aggregation into endpoints and single scores. In order to conduct this investigation, a detailed approach was adopted to facilitate identification of three main problems related to the single‐score calculation approach. The prevailing ReCiPe single‐sco…
Environmental sustainable decision making– The need and obstacles for integration of LCA into decision analysis
Pursuing necessary reductions in embedded GHG emissions of developed nations
A Framework for Development and Communication of Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment Methods
An absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA) addresses whether a production or consumption activity can be considered environmentally sustainable in an absolute sense. This involves a comparison of its environmental pressure to its allocated environmental carrying capacity. AESA methods have been developed in multiple academic fields, each using their own set of concepts and terms with little communication across the fields. A recen…
Lc‐impact
Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is a lively field of research, and data and models are continuously improved in terms of impact pathways covered, reliability, and spatial detail. However, many of these advancements are scattered throughout the scientific literature, making it difficult for practitioners to apply the new models. Here, we present the LC-IMPACT method that provides characterization factors at the damage level for 11 impact categ…
Addressing environmental sustainability of biochemicals
Sharing the safe operating space
In the light of increasing human pressures on the Earth system, the issue of sharing in the face of scarcity is more pressing than ever. The planetary boundary framework identifies and quantifies nine environmental boundaries and corresponding human pressures. However, when aiming to make the concept operational for decision support it is unclear how this safe operating space (SOS) within each of the planetary boundaries should be shared. This st…
Absolute environmental sustainability assessment of a Danish utility company relative to the Planetary Boundaries
Increasing environmental pressure from production and consumption of products and services is starting to affect Earth System stability. Thus, the Planetary Boundaries framework introduced a set of absolute boundaries for keeping the Earth System stable and delimiting a safe operating space for humanity. The sum of environmental pressures associated with human activities should not exceed the safe operating space. This includes utility companies …
Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities
We submit that the safe operating space of the planetary boundary of novel entities is exceeded since annual production and releases are increasing at a pace that outstrips the global capacity for assessment and monitoring. The novel entities boundary in the planetary boundaries framework refers to entities that are novel in a geological sense and that could have large-scale impacts that threaten the integrity of Earth system processes. We review…
Identification of dissipative emissions for improved assessment of metal resources in life cycle assessment
Environmental dissipation is a novel approach to account for impacts from mineral resources. In contrast to all other resource‐related life cycle impact assessment methods, which use data on extractions as input to calculation of indicator scores, environmental dissipation is characterized solely through emissions to the environment. Making environmental dissipation work as a viable resource use impact category in life cycle assessment requires, …
Reflecting the importance of human needs fulfilment in absolute sustainability assessments
Absolute environmental sustainability assessments (AESAs) evaluate whether the environmental impact of a product system is within its share of a safe operating space as determined by biophysical sustainability limits such as the planetary boundaries (PBs). The choice of sharing principle has significant influence on the result of an AESA, and any studies call for further research on how to share the safe operating space in an operational way that…
Pathways to sustainable plastics
Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets
With the growing urgency of addressing climate change it is increasingly important that decision makers at all levels are equipped to take efficient mitigation actions. This research evaluates the potential of four mitigation strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the building stock based on a case study, and these are further evaluated in terms of alignment with the remaining global emission budget and the planetary boundary for glob…
Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe
Advanced technologies are inherently dependent on critical minerals and their related metals. The mining extraction of these critical minerals leads to significant social and environmental impacts that extend beyond the regions where those advanced technologies are ultimately used. This study explores the global socio-environmental challenges arising from the European Climate Law's aim for net-zero greenhouse emissions by 2050, focusing on the EU…
Advancing absolute environmental sustainability assessment
Business (17 works) · Economics (17 works) · Environmental Impact and Sustainability (17 works) · Sustainability (17 works) · Ecology (15 works) · Environmental Science (15 works) · Computer Science (12 works) · Industrial ecology (11 works) · Life-cycle assessment (11 works) · Environmental resource management (9 works)