Absolute environmental sustainability assessment of a Danish utility company relative to the Planetary Boundaries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19467277 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Morten Ryberg (0000-0003-2589-8729, Quantitative Sustainability Assessment Department of Technology, Management and Economics Technical University of Denmark Kgs. Lyngby Denmark, corresponding author), Troels Kærgaard Bjerre (Odense Municipality), Per Henrik Nielsen (VandCenter Syd Odense Denmark), Michael Zwicky Hauschild (0000-0002-8331-7390, Quantitative Sustainability Assessment Department of Technology, Management and Economics Technical University of Denmark Kgs. Lyngby Denmark) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 765-777 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jiec.13075 |
| OpenAlex | W3092178122 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 51 |
Increasing environmental pressure from production and consumption of products and services is starting to affect Earth System stability. Thus, the Planetary Boundaries framework introduced a set of absolute boundaries for keeping the Earth System stable and delimiting a safe operating space for humanity. The sum of environmental pressures associated with human activities should not exceed the safe operating space. This includes utility companies whose activities relate to supply of water and treatment of waste‐ and stormwater. This study conducted an absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA) of a Danish utility company to evaluate if it could be considered absolutely sustainable relative to an assigned share of the safe operating space (SoSOS). The AESA evaluated the company's impacts relative to an assigned share of the Planetary Boundaries and relative to specific local boundaries for nitrogen and phosphorous emissions. Results showed that the assigned SoSOS was exceeded for 10 of 18 impact categories, for example, climate related boundaries were exceeded by up to a factor 7.8 while local nitrogen and phosphorus boundaries were exceeded by ca. a factor 16. The AESA can indicate to which degree the company exceeds its assigned SoSOS for certain impact categories and the processes and life‐cycle stages to focus on to become absolutely sustainable. This information is crucial for deriving specific impact reduction targets as part of environmental strategies for companies to become sustainable in an absolute sense
Business · Danish · Environmental impact assessment · Environmental resource management · Industrial ecology · Planetary boundaries · Sustainability · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Environmental Science · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy · Accounting · Ecology
Calculating the sustainability of products based on their efficiency and function
Using multi-regional input–output models for absolute environmental sustainability assessment of industries
Understanding a new emerging philosophy
Evaluating the effectiveness of sector-specific policies relative to the planetary boundaries
The risk-based environmental footprints and sustainability deficits of nations
Translating Earth system boundaries for cities and businesses
Towards circular plastics within planetary boundaries
Does sufficiency ensure sustainability? Applying sufficiency lifestyles allocation in absolute environmental sustainability assessment of textile fibers
Assessing company sustainability impact
Reflecting the importance of human needs fulfilment in absolute sustainability assessments
Bridging Global Sustainability Objectives With Corporate Reporting Standards
Absolute sustainability in product design and development
A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment
Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene
Planetary boundaries
A safe operating space for humanity
Allocating Ecological Space
Sharing the safe operating space
Absolute Sustainability‐Based Life Cycle Assessment (ASLCA)
Reconsideration of the planetary boundary for phosphorus
Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies
From Planetary Boundaries to national fair shares of the global safe operating space — How can the scales be bridged
A half-century of global phosphorus flows, stocks, production, consumption, recycling, and environmental impacts
Towards meaningful consumption-based planetary boundary indicators
Sharing the Emission Budget
The trajectory of the Anthropocene
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |