Clive Vinti
Biographic Data
| ID | 6298918 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Clive Vinti |
| GIVEN NAMES | Clive |
| FAMILY NAME | Vinti |
| SIGNATURE | VINTI C |
| AFFILIATIONS | School of Law, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3823-2400 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Judge-Made ‘Duty’ to Consider Climate Change in South Africa
Environmental legislation in South Africa does not explicitly require that the executive branch consider climate change in environmental decision-making. Yet, in a handful of climate cases, the executive has been found to have acted unlawfully (and thus unconstitutionally) by failing to do so. We argue that the case law has implicitly introduced a ‘duty’ to consider climate change mitigation and adaptation issues. The precedent set entails that i…
The right to mine in a ‘protected area’ in South Africa
This note assesses the right to mine in a ‘protected environment’ in South Africa within the prescripts of s 48 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 57 of 2003 (NEMPAA). Th
The Judge-Made ‘Duty’ to Consider Climate Change in South Africa
Environmental legislation in South Africa does not explicitly require that the executive branch consider climate change in environmental decision-making. Yet, in a handful of climate cases, the executive has been found to have acted unlawfully (and thus unconstitutionally) by failing to do so. We argue that the case law has implicitly introduced a ‘duty’ to consider climate change mitigation and adaptation issues. The precedent set entails that i…
The right to mine in a ‘protected area’ in South Africa
This note assesses the right to mine in a ‘protected environment’ in South Africa within the prescripts of s 48 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 57 of 2003 (NEMPAA). Th
The Judge-Made ‘Duty’ to Consider Climate Change in South Africa
Environmental legislation in South Africa does not explicitly require that the executive branch consider climate change in environmental decision-making. Yet, in a handful of climate cases, the executive has been found to have acted unlawfully (and thus unconstitutionally) by failing to do so. We argue that the case law has implicitly introduced a ‘duty’ to consider climate change mitigation and adaptation issues. The precedent set entails that i…
Human Rights and Development (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Legal Issues in South Africa (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Climate change (1 work) · Climate justice (1 work) · Conceptualization (1 work) · Constitution (1 work) · Constitutional court (1 work) · Corporate Law and Human Rights (1 work)