The Judge-Made ‘Duty’ to Consider Climate Change in South Africa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12930154 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Melanie Murcott (0000-0001-8311-2195, corresponding author), Clive Vinti (0000-0002-3823-2400) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 125-145 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-29 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Rights Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1757-9619 • E-ISSN: 1757-9627 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jhuman/huad069 |
| OpenAlex | W4391316489 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 20 |
Environmental legislation in South Africa does not explicitly require that the executive branch consider climate change in environmental decision-making. Yet, in a handful of climate cases, the executive has been found to have acted unlawfully (and thus unconstitutionally) by failing to do so. We argue that the case law has implicitly introduced a ‘duty’ to consider climate change mitigation and adaptation issues. The precedent set entails that in order to act lawfully as required by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, decision-makers must take climate change into account in various contexts. This article describes the role of the judiciary within South Africa’s transformative constitutional regime, and the interpretive approach they are mandated to adopt. The interpretive approach is a feature of South Africa’s normative conceptualization of the separation of powers. We then describe how, in the exercise of this role, the ‘duty’ to consider climate change has emerged and evolved through three instances of climate litigation in the High Courts, and one before the Water Tribunal. We conclude that the power of judiciary in South Africa to respond to the myriad human rights and justice implications of the climate crisis derives not only from constitutionally entrenched human rights. Equally important are the mechanisms within the broader transformative architecture of the constitutional order. By making this modest point, we hope to deepen the understanding of the utility of human rights in climate litigation in the Global South
Climate change · Climate justice · Conceptualization · Constitution · Constitutional court · Duty · Human rights · Law and economics · Legislation · Political science · Sociology · Environmental law and policy · Human Rights and Development · Legal Issues in South Africa · Ecology · Law
What Might Future Rights-Based Climate Litigation Look Like in Indonesia? A Preliminary Analysis
Exploring Institutional Barriers to Effective Human Rights-Based Climate Litigation in Latin American Courts—Lessons from Chile and Ecuador
Developments, Opportunities, and Complexities in Global South Climate Litigation
Using Climate Litigation to Strengthen Advocacy Strategies
The Multi-Dimensional Emergence of Climate-Induced Migrants in Rights-Based Litigation in the Global South
Climate Change Litigation in the Global South
Developments, Opportunities, and Complexities in Global South Climate Litigation
Using Climate Litigation to Strengthen Advocacy Strategies
The evolution and development of the principle of free, prior and informed consent in South Africa
The right to mine in a ‘protected area’ in South Africa
Judicial Policy Revisited
Legal Realism, Transformation and the Legacy of Dugard
The mysteriously appearing and disappearing doctrine of separation of powers
Transnational Climate Litigation
Climate Litigation in the Global South
| Citations per year | 1.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |