Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Neil C Manson

Biographic Data

ID6339065
NAMENeil C Manson
GIVEN NAMESNeil C
FAMILY NAMEManson
SIGNATUREMANSON N C
AFFILIATIONSLancaster University
ORCID0000-0002-8663-6784
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR7
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2004
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX0
  • ‘Take my kidneys but not my corneas’—Selective preferences as a hidden problem for ‘opt‐out’ organ donation policy

    Open Access•Nicola Williams, Nicola Jane Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2022

    With aims to both increase organ supply and better reflect individual donation preferences, many nations worldwide have shifted from ‘opt‐in’ to ‘opt‐out’ systems for post‐mortem organ donation (PMOD). In such countries, while a prospective donor's willingness to donate their organs/tissues for PMOD was previously ascertained— at least partially —by their having recorded positive donation preferences on an official register prior to death, this w…

  • Political self-deception and epistemic vice

    Open Access•Neil C Manson•ARTICLE•Ethics & Global Politics•2020•References: 1

    Galeotti argues that we can gain a better understanding of political decision making by drawing upon the notion of self-deception and offers a rich articulation of what self-deception is, and how and why it exerts influence upon political decision making, especially in high-stakes contexts where the decision seems to be counter to rationality. But such contexts are also explicable from a different perspective, with different theoretical resources…

  • Transitional P aternalism

    Open Access•Neil C Manson•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2015

    In many jurisdictions, adolescents acquire the right to consent to treatment; but in some cases their refusals – e.g. of life‐saving treatment – may not be respected. This asymmetry of adolescent consent and refusal seems puzzling, even incoherent. The aim here is to offer an original explanation, and a justification, of this asymmetry. Rather than trying to explain the asymmetry in terms of a variable standard of competence – where the adolescen…

  • Reading Onora O'Neill

    Neil C Manson, David Archard et al.•BOOK•Reading Onora O'Neill•2013

    Onora O'Neill is one of the foremost moral philosophers writing today. Her work on ethics and bioethics, political philosophy and the philosophy of Kant is extremely influential. Her landmark Reith Lectures on trust did much to establish the subject not only on the philosophical and political agenda but in the world of media, business and law more widely. Reading Onora O'Neill. Is the first book to examine and critically appraise the work of this…

  • Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics

    Open Access•Neil C Manson, Onora O’neill et al.•BOOK•Rethinking Informed Consent in…•2007

    Informed consent is a central topic in contemporary biomedical ethics. Yet attempts to set defensible and feasible standards for consenting have led to persistent difficulties. In Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics, first published in 2007, Neil Manson and Onora O'Neill set debates about informed consent in medicine and research in a fresh light. They show why informed consent cannot be fully specific or fully explicit, and why more specifi…

  • Brains, vats, and neurally-controlled animats

    Open Access•Neil C Manson, N MANSON•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004

  • Brains, vats, and neurally-controlled animats

    Open Access•Neil C Manson•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004•References: 3

No prominent works on this page.

  • Brains, vats, and neurally-controlled animats

    Open Access•Neil C Manson, N MANSON•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004

  • Brains, vats, and neurally-controlled animats

    Open Access•Neil C Manson•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004•References: 3

  • Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics

    Open Access•Neil C Manson, Onora O’neill et al.•BOOK•Rethinking Informed Consent in…•2007

    Informed consent is a central topic in contemporary biomedical ethics. Yet attempts to set defensible and feasible standards for consenting have led to persistent difficulties. In Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics, first published in 2007, Neil Manson and Onora O'Neill set debates about informed consent in medicine and research in a fresh light. They show why informed consent cannot be fully specific or fully explicit, and why more specifi…

  • Reading Onora O'Neill

    Neil C Manson, David Archard et al.•BOOK•Reading Onora O'Neill•2013

    Onora O'Neill is one of the foremost moral philosophers writing today. Her work on ethics and bioethics, political philosophy and the philosophy of Kant is extremely influential. Her landmark Reith Lectures on trust did much to establish the subject not only on the philosophical and political agenda but in the world of media, business and law more widely. Reading Onora O'Neill. Is the first book to examine and critically appraise the work of this…

  • Transitional P aternalism

    Open Access•Neil C Manson•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2015

    In many jurisdictions, adolescents acquire the right to consent to treatment; but in some cases their refusals – e.g. of life‐saving treatment – may not be respected. This asymmetry of adolescent consent and refusal seems puzzling, even incoherent. The aim here is to offer an original explanation, and a justification, of this asymmetry. Rather than trying to explain the asymmetry in terms of a variable standard of competence – where the adolescen…

  • Political self-deception and epistemic vice

    Open Access•Neil C Manson•ARTICLE•Ethics & Global Politics•2020•References: 1

    Galeotti argues that we can gain a better understanding of political decision making by drawing upon the notion of self-deception and offers a rich articulation of what self-deception is, and how and why it exerts influence upon political decision making, especially in high-stakes contexts where the decision seems to be counter to rationality. But such contexts are also explicable from a different perspective, with different theoretical resources…

  • ‘Take my kidneys but not my corneas’—Selective preferences as a hidden problem for ‘opt‐out’ organ donation policy

    Open Access•Nicola Williams, Nicola Jane Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2022

    With aims to both increase organ supply and better reflect individual donation preferences, many nations worldwide have shifted from ‘opt‐in’ to ‘opt‐out’ systems for post‐mortem organ donation (PMOD). In such countries, while a prospective donor's willingness to donate their organs/tissues for PMOD was previously ascertained— at least partially —by their having recorded positive donation preferences on an official register prior to death, this w…

Psychology (7 works) · Law (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Cognition (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Ethics in medical practice (3 works) · Medicine (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae