Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sarah Sorial

Biographic Data

ID6524198
NAMESarah Sorial
GIVEN NAMESSarah
FAMILY NAMESorial
SIGNATURESORIAL S
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
ORCID0000-0002-4294-3176
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS12
TOTAL CITATIONS7
WORKS AS AUTHOR12
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2007
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • Combatting mis and disinformation in the digital age

    Open Access•Jemimah Roberts, Shireen Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Griffith Law Review•2025

  • Deliberation and the Problems of Exclusion and Uptake

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2022

    In this paper, I suggest that one of the ways in which problems of exclusion from deliberation and uptake within deliberation can be ameliorated is to develop a more robust account of the deliberative virtues that socially privileged speakers/hearers ought to cultivate. Specifically, privileged speakers/hearers ought to cultivate the virtue of actively facilitating equitable and inclusive deliberative exchanges (which includes a cluster of virtue…

  • The Empathy Dilemma

    Open Access•Catriona Mackenzie, Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2021•Cited by: 2•References: 14

  • Free Speech, Hate Speech, and the Problem of (Manufactured) Authority

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2013•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    In this paper, I suggest that the concept of incitement as a way of identifying hate speech sometimes locates the harm caused by speech in the wrong sorts of places. Hate speech expressed in the form of “reasoned argument” or academic debate by persons with the relevant authority or expertise potentially causes more harm, though perhaps in less obvious ways. Literature on the concept of authority has demonstrated the way authoritative speakers or…

  • Politics of Violence

    Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2011•Cited by: 1

    The problem of political violence, its justifiability, and the question of how we ought to respond to it has been the subject of extensive debate since September 11, 2001, and subsequent terrorist attacks in Madrid (2004), London (2005), Bali (2005) and Mumbai (2008). The phenomenon of political violence is by no means new; nor have the measures taken by Western governments in response to recent terrorist attacks been unprecedented. Political vio…

  • Katharine Gelber, Speech Matters

    Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2011

  • The Limits of the Public Sphere

    Sarah Sorial, Catriona Mackenzie•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    In this paper, we give an account of some of the necessary conditions for an effectively functioning public sphere, and then explore the question of whether these conditions allow for the expression of ideas and values that are fundamentally incompatible with those of liberalism. We argue that speakers who advocate or glorify violence against democratic institutions fall outside the parameters of what constitutes legitimate public debate and may …

  • Free Speech, Autonomy, and the Marketplace of Ideas

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2010

  • Seyla Benhabib, with Jeremy Waldron, Bonnie Honig & Will Kymlicka, Another Cosmopolitanism

    Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2009

  • Law, Cosmopolitan Law and the Protection of Human Rights

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Journal of International…•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    In Between Facts and Norms, Habermas articulates a system of rights, including human rights, within the democratic constitutional state. For Habermas, while human rights, like other subjective rights have moral content, they do not structurally belong to a moral system; nor should they be grounded in one. Instead, human rights belong to a positive and coercive legal order upon which individuals can make actionable legal claims. Habermas extends t…

  • Sedition and the Question of Freedom of Speech

    Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2007

    Since September 11 2001, the Australian Federal Government has passed a number of pieces of legislation designed to fight terrorism. Included in the legislative package is an expansion of laws that target sedition. The law of sedition prohibits speech or writing that is intended to lead to violent conduct, or to 'incite' violence against and 'hatred' of elected governments. Given that sedition presents limitations and prohibitions against freedom…

  • Guilt by Association

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Alternative Law Journal•2007

  • The Empathy Dilemma

    Open Access•Catriona Mackenzie, Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2021•Cited by: 2•References: 14

  • Free Speech, Hate Speech, and the Problem of (Manufactured) Authority

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2013•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    In this paper, I suggest that the concept of incitement as a way of identifying hate speech sometimes locates the harm caused by speech in the wrong sorts of places. Hate speech expressed in the form of “reasoned argument” or academic debate by persons with the relevant authority or expertise potentially causes more harm, though perhaps in less obvious ways. Literature on the concept of authority has demonstrated the way authoritative speakers or…

  • Politics of Violence

    Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2011•Cited by: 1

    The problem of political violence, its justifiability, and the question of how we ought to respond to it has been the subject of extensive debate since September 11, 2001, and subsequent terrorist attacks in Madrid (2004), London (2005), Bali (2005) and Mumbai (2008). The phenomenon of political violence is by no means new; nor have the measures taken by Western governments in response to recent terrorist attacks been unprecedented. Political vio…

  • The Limits of the Public Sphere

    Sarah Sorial, Catriona Mackenzie•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    In this paper, we give an account of some of the necessary conditions for an effectively functioning public sphere, and then explore the question of whether these conditions allow for the expression of ideas and values that are fundamentally incompatible with those of liberalism. We argue that speakers who advocate or glorify violence against democratic institutions fall outside the parameters of what constitutes legitimate public debate and may …

  • Law, Cosmopolitan Law and the Protection of Human Rights

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Journal of International…•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    In Between Facts and Norms, Habermas articulates a system of rights, including human rights, within the democratic constitutional state. For Habermas, while human rights, like other subjective rights have moral content, they do not structurally belong to a moral system; nor should they be grounded in one. Instead, human rights belong to a positive and coercive legal order upon which individuals can make actionable legal claims. Habermas extends t…

  • Sedition and the Question of Freedom of Speech

    Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2007

    Since September 11 2001, the Australian Federal Government has passed a number of pieces of legislation designed to fight terrorism. Included in the legislative package is an expansion of laws that target sedition. The law of sedition prohibits speech or writing that is intended to lead to violent conduct, or to 'incite' violence against and 'hatred' of elected governments. Given that sedition presents limitations and prohibitions against freedom…

  • Guilt by Association

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Alternative Law Journal•2007

  • Law, Cosmopolitan Law and the Protection of Human Rights

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Journal of International…•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    In Between Facts and Norms, Habermas articulates a system of rights, including human rights, within the democratic constitutional state. For Habermas, while human rights, like other subjective rights have moral content, they do not structurally belong to a moral system; nor should they be grounded in one. Instead, human rights belong to a positive and coercive legal order upon which individuals can make actionable legal claims. Habermas extends t…

  • Seyla Benhabib, with Jeremy Waldron, Bonnie Honig & Will Kymlicka, Another Cosmopolitanism

    Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2009

  • Free Speech, Autonomy, and the Marketplace of Ideas

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2010

  • Politics of Violence

    Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2011•Cited by: 1

    The problem of political violence, its justifiability, and the question of how we ought to respond to it has been the subject of extensive debate since September 11, 2001, and subsequent terrorist attacks in Madrid (2004), London (2005), Bali (2005) and Mumbai (2008). The phenomenon of political violence is by no means new; nor have the measures taken by Western governments in response to recent terrorist attacks been unprecedented. Political vio…

  • Katharine Gelber, Speech Matters

    Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2011

  • The Limits of the Public Sphere

    Sarah Sorial, Catriona Mackenzie•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    In this paper, we give an account of some of the necessary conditions for an effectively functioning public sphere, and then explore the question of whether these conditions allow for the expression of ideas and values that are fundamentally incompatible with those of liberalism. We argue that speakers who advocate or glorify violence against democratic institutions fall outside the parameters of what constitutes legitimate public debate and may …

  • Free Speech, Hate Speech, and the Problem of (Manufactured) Authority

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2013•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    In this paper, I suggest that the concept of incitement as a way of identifying hate speech sometimes locates the harm caused by speech in the wrong sorts of places. Hate speech expressed in the form of “reasoned argument” or academic debate by persons with the relevant authority or expertise potentially causes more harm, though perhaps in less obvious ways. Literature on the concept of authority has demonstrated the way authoritative speakers or…

  • The Empathy Dilemma

    Open Access•Catriona Mackenzie, Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2021•Cited by: 2•References: 14

  • Deliberation and the Problems of Exclusion and Uptake

    Open Access•Sarah Sorial•ARTICLE•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2022

    In this paper, I suggest that one of the ways in which problems of exclusion from deliberation and uptake within deliberation can be ameliorated is to develop a more robust account of the deliberative virtues that socially privileged speakers/hearers ought to cultivate. Specifically, privileged speakers/hearers ought to cultivate the virtue of actively facilitating equitable and inclusive deliberative exchanges (which includes a cluster of virtue…

  • Combatting mis and disinformation in the digital age

    Open Access•Jemimah Roberts, Shireen Morris et al.•ARTICLE•Griffith Law Review•2025

Political science (12 works) · Law (11 works) · Law (10 works) · Philosophy (9 works) · Sociology (9 works) · Philosophy (8 works) · Politics (7 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 works) · Psychology (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae