Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Limits of the Public Sphere

The Advocacy of Violence

Bibliographic Data

ID12643232
AuthorsSarah Sorial (0000-0002-4294-3176, The University of Wollongong NSW, Australia, corresponding author), Catriona Mackenzie (0000-0002-3222-0257, Department of Philosophy Macquarie University, NSW, Australia)
Year2011
Volume12
Issue2
Pages165-188
Publication date2011-05-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Horizons (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1440-9917 • E-ISSN: 1568-5160
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1558/crit.v12i2.165
OpenAlexW2054845676
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited20

In this paper, we give an account of some of the necessary conditions for an effectively functioning public sphere, and then explore the question of whether these conditions allow for the expression of ideas and values that are fundamentally incompatible with those of liberalism. We argue that speakers who advocate or glorify violence against democratic institutions fall outside the parameters of what constitutes legitimate public debate and may in fact undermine the conditions necessary for the flourishing of free speech and public dialogue more generally

Democracy · Epistemology · Expression (computer science · Flourishing · Law and economics · Liberalism · Political science · Politics · Public sphere · Sociology · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • Why Democrats Should Be Committed to Future Generations

    Open Access•Matthias Fritsch•Dialogue•2023

  • Facts Do Care about Your Feelings

    Open Access•Joshua Foust, Burton St John•Journal of Communication Inquiry•2023

  • Scorekeeping in a pornographic language game

    Rae Langton, Caroline West•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1999

  • Disempowered Speech

    Jennifer Hornsby•Philosophical Topics•1995

  • Free Agency and Self-Worth

    Paul Benson, Journal Of Philosophy Inc et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•1994

  • Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism

    Open Access•Jolley Christman, Diana Tietjens Meyers et al.•Autonomy and the Challenges to…•2005

  • Rights in Conflict

    Jeremy Waldron•Ethics•1989

  • Relational Autonomy, Normative Authority and Perfectionism

    Open Access•Catriona Mackenzie•Journal of Social Philosophy•2008

  • Extreme Speech and Liberalism

    Maleiha Malik•Extreme speech and democracy•2009

  • Philosophy and Public Affairs

    Open Access•J S Haldane, Samuel Brittan et al.•Philosophy and Public Affairs•2000

  • Liberal Purposes

    Open Access•William A Galston•Liberal Purposes•1991

  • The Morality of Freedom

    Joseph Raz•The morality of freedom•1988

  • What is Free Speech

    Open Access•David Braddon‐mitchell, Caroline West•Journal of Political Philosophy•2004

  • The Rights of Unreasonable Citizens

    Open Access•Jonathan Quong•Journal of Political Philosophy•2004

  • On Pornography

    Open Access•Mary Kate Mcgowan•Hypatia•2005

  • Freedom of political speech, hate speech and the argument from democracy

    Open Access•Katharine Gelber•Contemporary Political Theory•2010

  • The Limits of Toleration

    Open Access•Rainer Forst•Constellations•2004

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae