Samantha L Seybold
Biographic Data
| ID | 6537249 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Samantha L Seybold |
| GIVEN NAMES | Samantha L |
| FAMILY NAME | Seybold |
| SIGNATURE | SEYBOLD S L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Purdue University |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2033-5388 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Why causal facts matter
This paper poses a series of objections to Sofia Jeppsson’s hard-line reply to Pereboom’s four-case manipulation argument. According to Jeppsson, the compatibilist can resist Pereboom’s argument by disregarding facts about what caused an agent to act (the ‘causal perspective’) and focusing primarily on the agent’s own perspective of their action (the ‘agential perspective’). Jeppsson argues that we have an obligation to disregard the causal persp…
Voter deterrence campaigns and the moral-epistemic landscape of political microtargeting
Not just “bodies with vaginas”
Medical students commonly learn how to administer pelvic exams by practicing on unconscious patients, often without first obtaining explicit consent from patients to do so. While 21 states currently have laws that require teaching hospitals to obtain consent from patients to participate in this educational experience, opposition from the medical community has stymied legislative progress. In this paper, I respond to the two most common reasons of…
It’s Called a Hustle, Sweetheart”
It’s Called a Hustle, Sweetheart”
Not just “bodies with vaginas”
Medical students commonly learn how to administer pelvic exams by practicing on unconscious patients, often without first obtaining explicit consent from patients to do so. While 21 states currently have laws that require teaching hospitals to obtain consent from patients to participate in this educational experience, opposition from the medical community has stymied legislative progress. In this paper, I respond to the two most common reasons of…
Why causal facts matter
This paper poses a series of objections to Sofia Jeppsson’s hard-line reply to Pereboom’s four-case manipulation argument. According to Jeppsson, the compatibilist can resist Pereboom’s argument by disregarding facts about what caused an agent to act (the ‘causal perspective’) and focusing primarily on the agent’s own perspective of their action (the ‘agential perspective’). Jeppsson argues that we have an obligation to disregard the causal persp…
Voter deterrence campaigns and the moral-epistemic landscape of political microtargeting
Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Action (physics) (1 work) · Aesthetics (1 work) · Alternative medicine (1 work) · Appeal (1 work)