Steven K Jones
Biographic Data
| ID | 6540239 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Steven K Jones |
| GIVEN NAMES | Steven K |
| FAMILY NAME | Jones |
| SIGNATURE | JONES S K |
| AFFILIATIONS | United States Air Force Academy |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1993 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1998 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Choices and opportunities: Another effect of framing on decisions
Many decisions can be framed either as ‘choices’ between alternative courses of action (e.g. Should I move to New York or stay in Chicago?) or as ‘opportunities’ to pursue a particular course of action (i.e. Should I move to New York?). Although there is no logical difference between these two different decision frames, there may be important psychological differences between them. In four studies, we explore the differences between ‘choices’ and…
Assessing the Accuracy of Decisions
Much research demonstrates that people's choices do not conform to utility theory, a model of rational decision-making (Baron, 1988; Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Slovic, Lichtenstein, & Fischhoff, 1988). Researchers have begun to question the normative status of utility theory in light of the many empirical violations of the theory. We argue that consistency with a formal model is not an appropriate standard for evaluating the quality of decisions. …
No prominent works on this page.
Assessing the Accuracy of Decisions
Much research demonstrates that people's choices do not conform to utility theory, a model of rational decision-making (Baron, 1988; Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Slovic, Lichtenstein, & Fischhoff, 1988). Researchers have begun to question the normative status of utility theory in light of the many empirical violations of the theory. We argue that consistency with a formal model is not an appropriate standard for evaluating the quality of decisions. …
Choices and opportunities: Another effect of framing on decisions
Many decisions can be framed either as ‘choices’ between alternative courses of action (e.g. Should I move to New York or stay in Chicago?) or as ‘opportunities’ to pursue a particular course of action (i.e. Should I move to New York?). Although there is no logical difference between these two different decision frames, there may be important psychological differences between them. In four studies, we explore the differences between ‘choices’ and…
Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Action (physics (1 works) · Business decision mapping (1 works) · Causal decision theory (1 works) · Decision analysis (1 works) · Decision theory (1 works) · Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 works)