Cristina Anguiano‐Carrasco
Biographic Data
| ID | 6541542 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Cristina Anguiano‐Carrasco |
| GIVEN NAMES | Cristina |
| FAMILY NAME | Anguiano‐Carrasco |
| SIGNATURE | CARRASCO C A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Universitat Rovira i Virgili |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Speaking without words
What candidates say in an interview is important—but so is how they say it. We draw on dual‐process theory to explain why interviewers rely on individuals' dynamic and static nonverbal cues to evaluate performance with quick, implicit inferences (System 1 processing). Yet, it remains unclear which cues most influence interviewers' judgments and whether moderators affecting interviewers' reliance on System 1 thinking (e.g., interview structure, mo…
Adjectives vs. Statements in Forced Choice and Likert Item Types
Our objective was to compare individuals' ability to intentionally make a positive impression when responding to a Five-Factor Model personality measure under adjective vs. statement and forced choice vs. Likert conditions. Participants were 1,798 high school students who were randomly assigned to either a condition receiving normal instructions or instructions to make a positive impression. We compared the groups' scores and validity estimates u…
A Structural Model–Based Optimal Person-Fit Procedure for Identifying Faking
This article proposes a two-stage procedure aimed at identifying faking in personality tests. The procedure, which can be considered as an extension and refinement of previous item response theory (IRT)-based proposals, combines the information provided by a structural equation model (SEM) in the first stage with that provided by an IRT-based optimal person-fit procedure in the second. In this article, the procedure is presented in its most basic…
Assessing the Impact of Faking on Binary Personality Measures
This article proposes a model-based multiple-group procedure for assessing the impact of faking on personality measures and the scores derived from these measures. The assessment is at the item level and the base model, which is intended for binary items, can be parameterized both as an Item Response Theory (IRT) model and as an Item Factor-Analytic (FA) model. The specific solution proposed is bidimensional, and the propensity to fake is specifi…
Speaking without words
What candidates say in an interview is important—but so is how they say it. We draw on dual‐process theory to explain why interviewers rely on individuals' dynamic and static nonverbal cues to evaluate performance with quick, implicit inferences (System 1 processing). Yet, it remains unclear which cues most influence interviewers' judgments and whether moderators affecting interviewers' reliance on System 1 thinking (e.g., interview structure, mo…
Assessing the Impact of Faking on Binary Personality Measures
This article proposes a model-based multiple-group procedure for assessing the impact of faking on personality measures and the scores derived from these measures. The assessment is at the item level and the base model, which is intended for binary items, can be parameterized both as an Item Response Theory (IRT) model and as an Item Factor-Analytic (FA) model. The specific solution proposed is bidimensional, and the propensity to fake is specifi…
A Structural Model–Based Optimal Person-Fit Procedure for Identifying Faking
This article proposes a two-stage procedure aimed at identifying faking in personality tests. The procedure, which can be considered as an extension and refinement of previous item response theory (IRT)-based proposals, combines the information provided by a structural equation model (SEM) in the first stage with that provided by an IRT-based optimal person-fit procedure in the second. In this article, the procedure is presented in its most basic…
Adjectives vs. Statements in Forced Choice and Likert Item Types
Our objective was to compare individuals' ability to intentionally make a positive impression when responding to a Five-Factor Model personality measure under adjective vs. statement and forced choice vs. Likert conditions. Participants were 1,798 high school students who were randomly assigned to either a condition receiving normal instructions or instructions to make a positive impression. We compared the groups' scores and validity estimates u…
Speaking without words
What candidates say in an interview is important—but so is how they say it. We draw on dual‐process theory to explain why interviewers rely on individuals' dynamic and static nonverbal cues to evaluate performance with quick, implicit inferences (System 1 processing). Yet, it remains unclear which cues most influence interviewers' judgments and whether moderators affecting interviewers' reliance on System 1 thinking (e.g., interview structure, mo…
Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Cognitive psychology (3 works) · Developmental psychology (3 works) · Personality (3 works) · Personality Traits and Psychology (3 works) · Psychometrics (3 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 works) · Arithmetic (2 works) · Binary number (2 works)