Raffaela Kunz
Biographic Data
| ID | 6551633 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Raffaela Kunz |
| GIVEN NAMES | Raffaela |
| FAMILY NAME | Kunz |
| SIGNATURE | KUNZ R |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Hong Kong |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0730-2346 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Ejil Roll of Honour; 2021 Ejil Peer Reviewer Prize; Changes in the Masthead; Germany v Italy
Judging International Judgments Anew? The Human Rights Courts before Domestic Courts
In recent times, instances of contestation against the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights have made headlines, and, in many of these cases, domestic courts have played a role by refusing to follow the human rights courts or even declaring their judgments to be unconstitutional. This article undertakes an in-depth analysis of these instances of judicial resistance and puts them into context. This shows that…
The Italian Constitutional Court and ‘Constructive Contestation’
Subsequent to precedents like Solange and Kadi , Judgment No. 238 handed down by the Italian Constitutional Court, represents novel jurisprudence that raises fundamental questions concerning the relationship between distinct legal orders. The present contribution aims to explore whether the judgment represents an instance of so-called ‘constructive contestation’ by domestic courts against international law not adhering to fundamental rights. It a…
Judging International Judgments Anew? The Human Rights Courts before Domestic Courts
In recent times, instances of contestation against the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights have made headlines, and, in many of these cases, domestic courts have played a role by refusing to follow the human rights courts or even declaring their judgments to be unconstitutional. This article undertakes an in-depth analysis of these instances of judicial resistance and puts them into context. This shows that…
The Italian Constitutional Court and ‘Constructive Contestation’
Subsequent to precedents like Solange and Kadi , Judgment No. 238 handed down by the Italian Constitutional Court, represents novel jurisprudence that raises fundamental questions concerning the relationship between distinct legal orders. The present contribution aims to explore whether the judgment represents an instance of so-called ‘constructive contestation’ by domestic courts against international law not adhering to fundamental rights. It a…
Judging International Judgments Anew? The Human Rights Courts before Domestic Courts
In recent times, instances of contestation against the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights have made headlines, and, in many of these cases, domestic courts have played a role by refusing to follow the human rights courts or even declaring their judgments to be unconstitutional. This article undertakes an in-depth analysis of these instances of judicial resistance and puts them into context. This shows that…
Ejil Roll of Honour; 2021 Ejil Peer Reviewer Prize; Changes in the Masthead; Germany v Italy
Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · European and International Law Studies (2 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Business (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Constitution (1 work) · Constitutional court (1 work) · Constructive (1 work)