Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Italian Constitutional Court and ‘Constructive Contestation’

A Miscarried Attempt?

Bibliographic Data

ID12735474
AuthorsRaffaela Kunz (0000-0003-0730-2346, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume14
Issue3
Pages621-627
Publication date2016-01-22
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of International Criminal Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1478-1395 • E-ISSN: 1478-1387
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/jicj/mqv074
OpenAlexW2317220706
LanguageEN

Subsequent to precedents like Solange and Kadi , Judgment No. 238 handed down by the Italian Constitutional Court, represents novel jurisprudence that raises fundamental questions concerning the relationship between distinct legal orders. The present contribution aims to explore whether the judgment represents an instance of so-called ‘constructive contestation’ by domestic courts against international law not adhering to fundamental rights. It argues that, even though in the short term the judgment of the Constitutional Court seemingly favours human rights, and therefore, also fosters a certain understanding of the ideals of the rule of law, strong reasons can be brought forward in support of the opposing interpretation. In the long run, this judgment may hamper the system of international adjudication and the (international) rule of law

Constitution · Constitutional court · Constructive · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · European and International Law Studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae