Cheryl MacNeil
Biographic Data
| ID | 6650646 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Cheryl MacNeil |
| GIVEN NAMES | Cheryl |
| FAMILY NAME | MacNeil |
| SIGNATURE | MACNEIL C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Sage Colleges |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 14 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
A Narrative Approach to Developing Standards for Trauma-Informed Peer Support
It is the era of evidence-based practices. Now more than ever, social programs are challenged to clearly describe their ideal frameworks and empirically demonstrate fidelity to their standards. In this study, the authors implemented a narrative approach to developing standards in a peer support program for people accessing mental health services. In an attempt to broaden the scope of evidence-based practices, emphasis was placed on developing sta…
Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation
Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation
I suggest that evaluators have much to offer in being stewards of citizen deliberation during the conduct of evaluative inquiry, especially in regards to the professional community’s guiding principle of “Responsibility to the general and public welfare.” The deliberative forum is reviewed as one evaluation methodology for bringing the theory of deliberative democratic evaluation into practice. The paper offers a number of reflections from the fi…
The Prose and Cons of Poetic Representation in Evaluation Reporting
The evaluation of modern day social programming presents challenges to the evaluation community. Among these are the need for others to understand the complexity of unique social circumstances and the inclusion of a diverse range of evaluation participants. Such challenges may call for alternative methods of representation in evaluation reporting. In this article I make a case for and demonstrate the use of poetic transcription as one form of pre…
A Narrative Approach to Developing Standards for Trauma-Informed Peer Support
It is the era of evidence-based practices. Now more than ever, social programs are challenged to clearly describe their ideal frameworks and empirically demonstrate fidelity to their standards. In this study, the authors implemented a narrative approach to developing standards in a peer support program for people accessing mental health services. In an attempt to broaden the scope of evidence-based practices, emphasis was placed on developing sta…
Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation
I suggest that evaluators have much to offer in being stewards of citizen deliberation during the conduct of evaluative inquiry, especially in regards to the professional community’s guiding principle of “Responsibility to the general and public welfare.” The deliberative forum is reviewed as one evaluation methodology for bringing the theory of deliberative democratic evaluation into practice. The paper offers a number of reflections from the fi…
The Prose and Cons of Poetic Representation in Evaluation Reporting
The evaluation of modern day social programming presents challenges to the evaluation community. Among these are the need for others to understand the complexity of unique social circumstances and the inclusion of a diverse range of evaluation participants. Such challenges may call for alternative methods of representation in evaluation reporting. In this article I make a case for and demonstrate the use of poetic transcription as one form of pre…
Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation
The Prose and Cons of Poetic Representation in Evaluation Reporting
The evaluation of modern day social programming presents challenges to the evaluation community. Among these are the need for others to understand the complexity of unique social circumstances and the inclusion of a diverse range of evaluation participants. Such challenges may call for alternative methods of representation in evaluation reporting. In this article I make a case for and demonstrate the use of poetic transcription as one form of pre…
Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation
Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation
I suggest that evaluators have much to offer in being stewards of citizen deliberation during the conduct of evaluative inquiry, especially in regards to the professional community’s guiding principle of “Responsibility to the general and public welfare.” The deliberative forum is reviewed as one evaluation methodology for bringing the theory of deliberative democratic evaluation into practice. The paper offers a number of reflections from the fi…
A Narrative Approach to Developing Standards for Trauma-Informed Peer Support
It is the era of evidence-based practices. Now more than ever, social programs are challenged to clearly describe their ideal frameworks and empirically demonstrate fidelity to their standards. In this study, the authors implemented a narrative approach to developing standards in a peer support program for people accessing mental health services. In an attempt to broaden the scope of evidence-based practices, emphasis was placed on developing sta…
Political science (4 works) · Engineering ethics (3 works) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 works) · Public relations (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Community Health and Development (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Deliberation (2 works) · Deliberative democracy (2 works) · Democracy (2 works)