Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Prose and Cons of Poetic Representation in Evaluation Reporting

Bibliographic Data

ID12470990
AuthorsCheryl MacNeil (CHERYL MacNEIL Consulting, Inc., 176 Fourth Street, Troy, NY 12180, corresponding author)
Year2000
Volume21
Issue3
Pages359-367
Publication date2000-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/109821400002100307
OpenAlexW4256030769
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited9

The evaluation of modern day social programming presents challenges to the evaluation community. Among these are the need for others to understand the complexity of unique social circumstances and the inclusion of a diverse range of evaluation participants. Such challenges may call for alternative methods of representation in evaluation reporting. In this article I make a case for and demonstrate the use of poetic transcription as one form of presenting evaluation findings. Taking language from focus group interviews, I constructed a poem intended to provoke report readers to engage in a process of reflective meaning making about the program being evaluated. I discuss my rationale for using poetic transcription as a form of evaluation reporting, the method by which I constructed the representation, and the reactions of the different stakeholders involved in the evaluation

Focus group · Inclusion (mineral · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Poetry · Political science · Process (computing · Representation (politics · Sociology · Transcription (linguistics · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice

  • Poetic Possibilities

    Open Access•Sherri Rae Colby, Brett Hogan Bodily•International Review of…•2018

  • A personal and poetic inquiry into Dutch coloniality

    Open Access•Joel E Berends, Ana Rojo et al.•Wacana Journal of the Humanities…•2023

  • Evaluator as Steward of Citizen Deliberation

    Open Access•Cheryl MacNeil•American Journal of Evaluation•2002

  • Evaluation Extrapolations

    Open Access•Jennifer C Greene•American Journal of Evaluation•2001

  • Providing Public Servants What They Need

    Open Access•Kimberley R Isett, Diana M Hicks et al.•Public Administration Review•2018

  • Qualitative Studies in Special Education

    Open Access•Ellen Brantlinger, Robert T Jiménez et al.•Journal of Exceptional Children•2005

  • From prose to poetry

    Open Access•Julie E N Irish•Qualitative Research Journal•2021

  • Exploring Alternative Approaches for Presenting Evaluation Results

    Open Access•Jeremiah D Johnson, Jeremiah Johnson et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2013

  • Evaluation

    Howard E Freeman, Mark W Lipsey et al.•Evaluation•1993

  • Analyzing & Reporting Focus Group Results

    Richard A Krueger, Richard B Krueger et al.•Analyzing & reporting focus group…•1998

  • Peer Debriefing in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Sharon Spall•Qualitative Inquiry•1998

  • That Rare Feeling

    Open Access•Corrine Glesne•Qualitative Inquiry•1997

Citations per year0.32
Citation span2001 - 2023 (23)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae