Mika Suzuki
Biographic Data
| ID | 6763673 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Mika Suzuki |
| GIVEN NAMES | Mika |
| FAMILY NAME | Suzuki |
| SIGNATURE | SUZUKI M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Kyoto University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3861-0766 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Standards of Conducts for Biostatisticians and Stem Cell Researchers
We proposed the Standards of Conducts to provide a general framework that will serve as the basis for guiding each biostatistician and stem cell researcher to formulate their personal standards, rather than as rules with which they are required to comply. Given the responsibility and characteristics of their work, they are expected to maintain independence and work autonomously as professionals. Each of the Standards of Conducts comprises a pream…
Patient perspectives on research use of residual biospecimens and health information
Very few attempts have been made to survey patient opinions, particularly regarding the use of residual biospecimens and health information in research, to clarify their values. We conducted a questionnaire survey that targeted outpatients of a university hospital to gauge their awareness levels and understand patient perspectives on research that uses these items. Few patients felt that obtaining individual consent for each research study was ne…
Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan
Research Ethics Committees (RECs) are designed to protect human subjects in research. It is essential to recognize whether the RECs are achieving this goal. Several studies have reported on RECs; however, detailed data regarding the quality of research protocols and the review process of RECs have not been reported in Japan. We examine research protocols reviewed by RECs and the review processes at three institutions using a novel checklist we de…
Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan
Research Ethics Committees (RECs) are designed to protect human subjects in research. It is essential to recognize whether the RECs are achieving this goal. Several studies have reported on RECs; however, detailed data regarding the quality of research protocols and the review process of RECs have not been reported in Japan. We examine research protocols reviewed by RECs and the review processes at three institutions using a novel checklist we de…
Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan
Research Ethics Committees (RECs) are designed to protect human subjects in research. It is essential to recognize whether the RECs are achieving this goal. Several studies have reported on RECs; however, detailed data regarding the quality of research protocols and the review process of RECs have not been reported in Japan. We examine research protocols reviewed by RECs and the review processes at three institutions using a novel checklist we de…
Patient perspectives on research use of residual biospecimens and health information
Very few attempts have been made to survey patient opinions, particularly regarding the use of residual biospecimens and health information in research, to clarify their values. We conducted a questionnaire survey that targeted outpatients of a university hospital to gauge their awareness levels and understand patient perspectives on research that uses these items. Few patients felt that obtaining individual consent for each research study was ne…
Standards of Conducts for Biostatisticians and Stem Cell Researchers
We proposed the Standards of Conducts to provide a general framework that will serve as the basis for guiding each biostatistician and stem cell researcher to formulate their personal standards, rather than as rules with which they are required to comply. Given the responsibility and characteristics of their work, they are expected to maintain independence and work autonomously as professionals. Each of the Standards of Conducts comprises a pream…
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Ethics in Clinical Research (3 works) · Ethics in medical practice (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Engineering ethics (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Public relations (2 works)