Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan
Proposed Measures for Improvement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12807018 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mika Suzuki (0000-0002-3861-0766, Kyoto University, corresponding author), Keiko Sato (0000-0003-0226-1338, Kyoto University Hospital) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 256-266 |
| Publication date | 2016-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1556-2646 • E-ISSN: 1556-2654 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1556264616660644 |
| PMID | 27534589 |
| OpenAlex | W2517580589 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 7 |
Research Ethics Committees (RECs) are designed to protect human subjects in research. It is essential to recognize whether the RECs are achieving this goal. Several studies have reported on RECs; however, detailed data regarding the quality of research protocols and the review process of RECs have not been reported in Japan. We examine research protocols reviewed by RECs and the review processes at three institutions using a novel checklist we developed. The data show that approximately half of all examined protocols lacked a clearly written "Background" section that defines the study rationale and design. These results reiterate suggestions made in previous research regarding educational programs and support departments that could enhance responsible conduct in clinical research to protect human subjects in Japan
Engineering ethics · Ethics committee · Management science · Political science · Process (computing · Research ethics · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Psychology · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.8 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |