Tracy A Muenz
Biographic Data
| ID | 7116538 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Tracy A Muenz |
| GIVEN NAMES | Tracy A |
| FAMILY NAME | Muenz |
| SIGNATURE | MUENZ T A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Alliant University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1996 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Written Expression, Hooper, and Blind Rating
Written Expression, Hooper, and Blind Rating
Much research has supported the assertion of Hooper, et al.'s 1994 claims that specific stimuli perform better than others in eliciting well-developed written responses; however, previous research was conducted with raters who were aware of the hypotheses. The present study of 29 middle school children validated previous support for Hooper, et al.'s assertions by implementing blind rating and, once again, finding that significant differences betw…
Interrater Reliability of the Written Expression Subtest of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised
This study examined the interrater reliability of the measure of written expression in the Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised. A sample more diverse in years of education and age than the normed population was used in this study. Fifty subjects from California, comprised of 72% females and 74% Caucasians, and ranging in age from 13 to 46, comprised the sample. Subjects were administered the "box" prompt from the PIAT-R Written Expression…
No prominent works on this page.
Interrater Reliability of the Written Expression Subtest of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised
This study examined the interrater reliability of the measure of written expression in the Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised. A sample more diverse in years of education and age than the normed population was used in this study. Fifty subjects from California, comprised of 72% females and 74% Caucasians, and ranging in age from 13 to 46, comprised the sample. Subjects were administered the "box" prompt from the PIAT-R Written Expression…
Written Expression, Hooper, and Blind Rating
Written Expression, Hooper, and Blind Rating
Much research has supported the assertion of Hooper, et al.'s 1994 claims that specific stimuli perform better than others in eliciting well-developed written responses; however, previous research was conducted with raters who were aware of the hypotheses. The present study of 29 middle school children validated previous support for Hooper, et al.'s assertions by implementing blind rating and, once again, finding that significant differences betw…
Developmental psychology (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Rating scale (3 works) · Clinical Psychology (2 works) · Clinical Psychology (2 works) · Cognitive psychology (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Expression (computer science (2 works) · Writing and Handwriting Education (2 works) · Achievement test (1 work)