Jooyong Park
Biographic Data
| ID | 7121688 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jooyong Park |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jooyong |
| FAMILY NAME | Park |
| SIGNATURE | PARK J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Seoul National University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5113-5111 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 9 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Self-study followed by discussion enhances learning for high school students
A recent study by Lim and Park (2023) compared specific combinations of learning activities in higher education. They found that self-study followed by discussion led to better retention and transfer outcomes than more conventional approaches, such as starting with a lecture. In this study, we sought to replicate and extend these findings for high school students. Two experimental conditions were compared: discussion preceded by lecture and discu…
The Effect of Evaluating Others’ Decision-Making Results on Subsequent Decision-Making
Effective decision-making is crucial for both individuals and organizations. To improve individual's decision-making, traditional methods involve practicing and providing feedback. While these methods are effective, we propose evaluating others' decision-making as a more efficient training approach, and in this study, we explore its potential through two experiments. In Experiment 1,109 participants completed an initial task and then took part in…
Asking questions matters
The ways students learn through dialogue are diversifying, in terms of whom they engage with and how. With the recent advancement of AI chatbots like ChatGPT, learners can leverage aspects of dialogue, such as asking and answering questions, without a peer or instructor being present. Given the lack of experimental studies validating their effect, this study compares three dialogue conditions involving Peer, ChatGPT, and Intelligent Tutoring Syst…
Self-Study and Discussion Promote Students’ Science Learning
Many have investigated the effectiveness of teaching methods across different disciplines. In a previous study, we found the superior effectiveness of a two-part learning sequence consisting of self-study followed by discussion in humanities education. To examine the possibility of similar findings in science education, we compared that sequence with a traditional lecture–based teaching. Results indicate that self-study combined with discussion y…
The Impact of Hybrid Collaboration Methods on Idea Quantity, Quality, and Collaborative Interactions
The hybrid collaboration method, which combines individual and collaborative idea generation sequentially, can help generate more creative ideas compared to collaborating from the beginning, by encouraging active participation during collaboration. While the effectiveness of hybrid collaboration methods varies depending on the combination order of individual and collaborative idea generation, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal order. T…
Peer assessment and individual contribution analysis for measuring collaborative problem solving capability
Accurately measuring collaborative problem-solving capability (CPSC) is not only important in itself, but also in order to develop education and training programs. However, most existing CPSC measurement tools have two weaknesses: not accounting for individual’s contribution to the final outcome and relying on predefined problems. Addressing these limitations, we extended criteria of the PISA 2015 framework to consider individual’s contribution t…
Self-study enhances the learning effect of discussions
Background Academic learning in higher education requires diverse activities such as reading, reviewing, and discussion. However, there are relatively few studies on the effect of the combination of these activities on learning outcomes. In this study, we investigated the combination of self-study and discussions at a selective Korean university.Methods The present study compared the two-part instructional sequence of three groups: watching a vid…
Enhancing Asian University Education via Writing, Peer-Assessment, and Discussion
본 연구는 아시아의 발전의 한 방법으로 교육, 특히 대학 수업 혁신을 제안하였다. 수업은 교육의 목표를 구체적으로 구현하는 활동임에도 대학 구성원 간에도 이에 대한 깊이 있는 논의가 이루어지지 않고 있다. 사회적 합의가 필요한 다른 교육 관련 문제와는 달리, 대학이 독자적으로 바꿀 수 있는 부분이기도 하다. 이 글에서는 아시아 대학 수업의 문제를 과도하게 지식 습득을 강조하는 데 있다고 보았다. 구체적으로 강의의 비중이 높고 지식의 양을 강조하는 평가가 널리 사용된다는 것이다. 이에 대한 대안으로, 지식과 사고력의 균형을 추구하는 교육을 제안하였다. 이를 위한 수업 방법으로 문제 중심 학습, 플립 러닝, 그리고 미네르바 스쿨의 완전히 능동적인 학습을 검토하였고, 비용과 운영상의 문제 등으로 확장이 어렵다고 평가하였다. 이들 대신, 이들의 장점을 조합한 보다 실용적인 방법을 소개하였다. 소개된 방…
Causal invariance as a tacit aspiration
For causal knowledge to be worth learning, it must remain valid when that knowledge is applied. Because unknown background causes are potentially present, and may vary across the learning and application contexts, extricating the strength of a candidate cause requires an assumption regarding the decomposition of the observed outcome into the unobservable influences from the candidate and from background causes. Acquiring stable, useable causal kn…
No prominent works on this page.
Enhancing Asian University Education via Writing, Peer-Assessment, and Discussion
본 연구는 아시아의 발전의 한 방법으로 교육, 특히 대학 수업 혁신을 제안하였다. 수업은 교육의 목표를 구체적으로 구현하는 활동임에도 대학 구성원 간에도 이에 대한 깊이 있는 논의가 이루어지지 않고 있다. 사회적 합의가 필요한 다른 교육 관련 문제와는 달리, 대학이 독자적으로 바꿀 수 있는 부분이기도 하다. 이 글에서는 아시아 대학 수업의 문제를 과도하게 지식 습득을 강조하는 데 있다고 보았다. 구체적으로 강의의 비중이 높고 지식의 양을 강조하는 평가가 널리 사용된다는 것이다. 이에 대한 대안으로, 지식과 사고력의 균형을 추구하는 교육을 제안하였다. 이를 위한 수업 방법으로 문제 중심 학습, 플립 러닝, 그리고 미네르바 스쿨의 완전히 능동적인 학습을 검토하였고, 비용과 운영상의 문제 등으로 확장이 어렵다고 평가하였다. 이들 대신, 이들의 장점을 조합한 보다 실용적인 방법을 소개하였다. 소개된 방…
Causal invariance as a tacit aspiration
For causal knowledge to be worth learning, it must remain valid when that knowledge is applied. Because unknown background causes are potentially present, and may vary across the learning and application contexts, extricating the strength of a candidate cause requires an assumption regarding the decomposition of the observed outcome into the unobservable influences from the candidate and from background causes. Acquiring stable, useable causal kn…
Self-study enhances the learning effect of discussions
Background Academic learning in higher education requires diverse activities such as reading, reviewing, and discussion. However, there are relatively few studies on the effect of the combination of these activities on learning outcomes. In this study, we investigated the combination of self-study and discussions at a selective Korean university.Methods The present study compared the two-part instructional sequence of three groups: watching a vid…
Peer assessment and individual contribution analysis for measuring collaborative problem solving capability
Accurately measuring collaborative problem-solving capability (CPSC) is not only important in itself, but also in order to develop education and training programs. However, most existing CPSC measurement tools have two weaknesses: not accounting for individual’s contribution to the final outcome and relying on predefined problems. Addressing these limitations, we extended criteria of the PISA 2015 framework to consider individual’s contribution t…
Asking questions matters
The ways students learn through dialogue are diversifying, in terms of whom they engage with and how. With the recent advancement of AI chatbots like ChatGPT, learners can leverage aspects of dialogue, such as asking and answering questions, without a peer or instructor being present. Given the lack of experimental studies validating their effect, this study compares three dialogue conditions involving Peer, ChatGPT, and Intelligent Tutoring Syst…
Self-Study and Discussion Promote Students’ Science Learning
Many have investigated the effectiveness of teaching methods across different disciplines. In a previous study, we found the superior effectiveness of a two-part learning sequence consisting of self-study followed by discussion in humanities education. To examine the possibility of similar findings in science education, we compared that sequence with a traditional lecture–based teaching. Results indicate that self-study combined with discussion y…
The Impact of Hybrid Collaboration Methods on Idea Quantity, Quality, and Collaborative Interactions
The hybrid collaboration method, which combines individual and collaborative idea generation sequentially, can help generate more creative ideas compared to collaborating from the beginning, by encouraging active participation during collaboration. While the effectiveness of hybrid collaboration methods varies depending on the combination order of individual and collaborative idea generation, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal order. T…
Self-study followed by discussion enhances learning for high school students
A recent study by Lim and Park (2023) compared specific combinations of learning activities in higher education. They found that self-study followed by discussion led to better retention and transfer outcomes than more conventional approaches, such as starting with a lecture. In this study, we sought to replicate and extend these findings for high school students. Two experimental conditions were compared: discussion preceded by lecture and discu…
The Effect of Evaluating Others’ Decision-Making Results on Subsequent Decision-Making
Effective decision-making is crucial for both individuals and organizations. To improve individual's decision-making, traditional methods involve practicing and providing feedback. While these methods are effective, we propose evaluating others' decision-making as a more efficient training approach, and in this study, we explore its potential through two experiments. In Experiment 1,109 participants completed an initial task and then took part in…
Psychology (6 works) · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Mathematics education (4 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 works) · Education and Learning Interventions (2 works) · Higher education (2 works) · Innovative Teaching Methods (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works)