Asking questions matters
Comparing the effect of learning through dialogue with peers, ChatGPT, and intelligent tutoring system
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21631385 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ji Won Yang (0000-0002-9885-7701, Seoul National University), Kiroong Choe (0000-0002-6084-2539, Seoul National University), Jaeseo Lim (0000-0003-0978-9098, Jeonju University), Jooyong Park (0000-0002-5113-5111, Seoul National University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 5870-5886 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-26 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interactive Learning Environments (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-4820 • E-ISSN: 1744-5191 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10494820.2025.2488984 |
| OpenAlex | W4409514093 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 36 |
The ways students learn through dialogue are diversifying, in terms of whom they engage with and how. With the recent advancement of AI chatbots like ChatGPT, learners can leverage aspects of dialogue, such as asking and answering questions, without a peer or instructor being present. Given the lack of experimental studies validating their effect, this study compares three dialogue conditions involving Peer, ChatGPT, and Intelligent Tutoring System. A chat interface was developed where students could exchange questions with a Peer, ask questions to a GPT agent, or answer questions displayed by an ITS agent. After reading a biology passage, 114 university students from Republic of Korea solved two practice items and then engaged in dialogue with their respective counterparts about what they had studied. Finally, they were instructed to re-answer the practice items and solve two new isomorphic test problems. The Peer and GPT groups, where students could ask questions, demonstrated significantly higher post-dialogue performance in both absolute score and conditional correct rate compared to the ITS group, which only answered questions. The number of questions asked and the level of trust in the dialogue were positively correlated with individual differences in performance. Our findings highlight the importance of asking questions over asking many when learning through dialogue, laying the groundwork for designing more effective interactive learning systems
Educational technology · Human–computer interaction · Intelligent tutoring system · Mathematics education · Multimedia · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Psychology
Visible Learning for Teachers
Collaborative reasoning
The generation effect
Student Thought and Classroom Language
The Icap Framework
Google Effects on Memory
Students' questions
Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes
Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Classroom dialogue
G*Power 3
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
Evolution and trends in intelligent tutoring systems research
The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education
A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education
Self-Study and Discussion Promote Students’ Science Learning
Question Asking During Tutoring
Quality Talk
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |