Robert S Lockhart
Biographic Data
| ID | 7197030 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Robert S Lockhart |
| GIVEN NAMES | Robert S |
| FAMILY NAME | Lockhart |
| SIGNATURE | LOCKHART R S |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Toronto |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1970 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1978 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Levels of processing
These comments take up the major issues raised in Eysenck's (1978) critique of Craik & Lockhart (1972): The problem of circularity in the definition of ‘depth’, the distinction between qualitative and quantitative differences in encoding, and the relationship between the concepts of depth, strength and elaboration. It is claimed that despite certain weaknesses, the original formulation possesses considerable heuristic value
Levels of processing
Memory and the theory of signal detection
A recurrent problem in the study of recognition memory has been that of combining hits and false alarms (or correct and incorrect responses) into a single index of performance. That the proportion of correct responses in a yes/no or multiple-choice recognition test may in some way be contaminated by factors other than the state of the memory system has never been seriously disputed, but only recently has the question received detailed and systema…
No prominent works on this page.
Memory and the theory of signal detection
A recurrent problem in the study of recognition memory has been that of combining hits and false alarms (or correct and incorrect responses) into a single index of performance. That the proportion of correct responses in a yes/no or multiple-choice recognition test may in some way be contaminated by factors other than the state of the memory system has never been seriously disputed, but only recently has the question received detailed and systema…
Levels of processing
Levels of processing
These comments take up the major issues raised in Eysenck's (1978) critique of Craik & Lockhart (1972): The problem of circularity in the definition of ‘depth’, the distinction between qualitative and quantitative differences in encoding, and the relationship between the concepts of depth, strength and elaboration. It is claimed that despite certain weaknesses, the original formulation possesses considerable heuristic value
Cognitive psychology (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Memory Processes and Influences (2 works) · Child and Animal Learning Development (1 work) · Cognition (1 work) · Cognitive science (1 work) · Cognitive Science and Education Research (1 work) · Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 work) · Design Education and Practice (1 work)