Levels of processing
A reply to Eysenck
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14061979 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert S Lockhart (University of Toronto, corresponding author), Fergus I M Craik (0000-0001-8073-3236) |
| Year | 1978 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 171-175 |
| Publication date | 1978-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1978.tb01644.x |
| OpenAlex | W2166813047 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
These comments take up the major issues raised in Eysenck's (1978) critique of Craik & Lockhart (1972): The problem of circularity in the definition of ‘depth’, the distinction between qualitative and quantitative differences in encoding, and the relationship between the concepts of depth, strength and elaboration. It is claimed that despite certain weaknesses, the original formulation possesses considerable heuristic value
Cognitive psychology · Elaboration · Encoding (memory) · Epistemology · Heuristic · Humanities · Statistics · Strengths and weaknesses · Value (mathematics) · Cognitive Science and Mapping · Design Education and Practice · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1988 - 2001 (14) |
| Highly cited | No |