Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Johannes Hamann

Biographic Data

ID7390046
NAMEJohannes Hamann
GIVEN NAMESJohannes
FAMILY NAMEHamann
SIGNATUREHAMANN J
AFFILIATIONSKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
ORCID0000-0002-3861-6017
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS9
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT9
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2007
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX0
  • Informing the development of a decision aid

    Open Access•Katharina Müller, Florian Schuster et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2023

  • How do employees currently admitted to acute psychiatric inpatient units rate their psychosocial working conditions with the Copsoq (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire)

    Open Access•Adele Brucks, Anne Lang et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2023

    BACKGROUND: In recent years it could be shown that psychosocial working conditions and mental health of employees are closely correlated. One well-established instrument to measure psychosocial stress at work is the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire, German Standard Version). It is an 84 item self-rating instrument addressing several domains of psychosocial working conditions and is generally used for risk assessments in companies. AI…

  • Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial

    Open Access•Stefanie Becher, Fabian Holzhüter et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2021

    BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is appreciated as a promising model of communication between clinicians and patients. However, in acute mental health settings, its implementation is still unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine barriers and facilitators of SDM with acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: trial that demonstrated a sign…

  • ‘Triadic’ shared decision making in mental health

    Open Access•Florian Schuster, Fabian Holzhüter et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2021

    BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) in mental health may contribute to greater patient satisfaction and is sometimes associated with better health outcomes. Here, SDM should not only involve service users and clinicians but also involve the service users' caregivers. AIM: This study aimed to achieve better insight into the current SDM patterns of triads of service users, caregivers and clinicians in inpatient mental health care and the three…

  • Clinical Decision-Making During Psychiatric Ward Rounds

    Open Access•Fabian Holzhüter, Florian Schuster et al.•ARTICLE•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2021

    Introduction: For psychiatric in-patients, ward rounds are a prominent occasion for decision making. As previous findings on shared decision-making (SDM) patterns mostly derive from out-patients and one-to-one-consultations, it was our aim to investigate SDM during psychiatric ward rounds. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study and included n = 62 in-patients from seven different psychiatric wards. We collected data from the patient and th…

  • Effects of a question prompt sheet on active patient behaviour

    Open Access•Johannes Hamann, Nikolaos Maris et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2014

    BACKGROUND: A deeper engagement into medical decision-making is demanded by treatment guidelines for patients with affective disorders. There is to date little evidence on what facilitates active behaviour of patients with depression. In general medicine 'question prompt sheets' (QPSs) have been shown to change patients' behaviour in the consultation and improve treatment satisfaction but there is no evidence for such interventions for mental hea…

  • How should patients behave to facilitate shared decision making – the doctors’ view

    Open Access•Johannes Hamann, Rosmarie Mendel et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2012

    Objective To study how physicians feel about patients’ efforts to be engaged in shared decision making (SDM). Study setting and design Survey of physicians from distinctly different medical disciplines (238 psychiatrists and 169 vascular surgeons). Participants were requested to judge which patient behaviours they find helpful and which behaviours detrimental for SDM. Results Psychiatrists and surgeons had rather positive attitudes about active p…

  • Do physicians’ recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment options

    Open Access•Rosmarie Mendel, Eva Traut‐mattausch et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2012

    Context and objective Shared decision making is especially advocated for preference‐sensitive decisions. We investigated whether physicians’ recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment option when making a preference‐sensitive decision. Design, participants and methods Inpatients ( N = 102 with schizophrenia, N = 101 with multiple sclerosis) were presented with a hypothetical scenario (the choice between two drugs). They wer…

  • Participation preferences of patients with acute and chronic conditions

    Open Access•Johannes Hamann, Bruno Neuner et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2007

    Background There is little knowledge as to whether the chronicity of a disease affects patients’ desire for participation. Aim To study whether participation preferences vary according to the type of disease. Design, participants and methods Data of 1393 patients from six trials with different medical conditions (hypertension, depression, breast cancer, schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis, minor traumas) were pooled and analysed, using multiple reg…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Participation preferences of patients with acute and chronic conditions

    Open Access•Johannes Hamann, Bruno Neuner et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2007

    Background There is little knowledge as to whether the chronicity of a disease affects patients’ desire for participation. Aim To study whether participation preferences vary according to the type of disease. Design, participants and methods Data of 1393 patients from six trials with different medical conditions (hypertension, depression, breast cancer, schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis, minor traumas) were pooled and analysed, using multiple reg…

  • How should patients behave to facilitate shared decision making – the doctors’ view

    Open Access•Johannes Hamann, Rosmarie Mendel et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2012

    Objective To study how physicians feel about patients’ efforts to be engaged in shared decision making (SDM). Study setting and design Survey of physicians from distinctly different medical disciplines (238 psychiatrists and 169 vascular surgeons). Participants were requested to judge which patient behaviours they find helpful and which behaviours detrimental for SDM. Results Psychiatrists and surgeons had rather positive attitudes about active p…

  • Do physicians’ recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment options

    Open Access•Rosmarie Mendel, Eva Traut‐mattausch et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2012

    Context and objective Shared decision making is especially advocated for preference‐sensitive decisions. We investigated whether physicians’ recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment option when making a preference‐sensitive decision. Design, participants and methods Inpatients ( N = 102 with schizophrenia, N = 101 with multiple sclerosis) were presented with a hypothetical scenario (the choice between two drugs). They wer…

  • Effects of a question prompt sheet on active patient behaviour

    Open Access•Johannes Hamann, Nikolaos Maris et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2014

    BACKGROUND: A deeper engagement into medical decision-making is demanded by treatment guidelines for patients with affective disorders. There is to date little evidence on what facilitates active behaviour of patients with depression. In general medicine 'question prompt sheets' (QPSs) have been shown to change patients' behaviour in the consultation and improve treatment satisfaction but there is no evidence for such interventions for mental hea…

  • Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial

    Open Access•Stefanie Becher, Fabian Holzhüter et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2021

    BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is appreciated as a promising model of communication between clinicians and patients. However, in acute mental health settings, its implementation is still unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine barriers and facilitators of SDM with acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: trial that demonstrated a sign…

  • ‘Triadic’ shared decision making in mental health

    Open Access•Florian Schuster, Fabian Holzhüter et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2021

    BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) in mental health may contribute to greater patient satisfaction and is sometimes associated with better health outcomes. Here, SDM should not only involve service users and clinicians but also involve the service users' caregivers. AIM: This study aimed to achieve better insight into the current SDM patterns of triads of service users, caregivers and clinicians in inpatient mental health care and the three…

  • Clinical Decision-Making During Psychiatric Ward Rounds

    Open Access•Fabian Holzhüter, Florian Schuster et al.•ARTICLE•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2021

    Introduction: For psychiatric in-patients, ward rounds are a prominent occasion for decision making. As previous findings on shared decision-making (SDM) patterns mostly derive from out-patients and one-to-one-consultations, it was our aim to investigate SDM during psychiatric ward rounds. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study and included n = 62 in-patients from seven different psychiatric wards. We collected data from the patient and th…

  • Informing the development of a decision aid

    Open Access•Katharina Müller, Florian Schuster et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2023

  • How do employees currently admitted to acute psychiatric inpatient units rate their psychosocial working conditions with the Copsoq (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire)

    Open Access•Adele Brucks, Anne Lang et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2023

    BACKGROUND: In recent years it could be shown that psychosocial working conditions and mental health of employees are closely correlated. One well-established instrument to measure psychosocial stress at work is the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire, German Standard Version). It is an 84 item self-rating instrument addressing several domains of psychosocial working conditions and is generally used for risk assessments in companies. AI…

Medicine (8 works) · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 works) · Psychiatry (8 works) · Psychology (7 works) · Nursing (6 works) · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (5 works) · Family medicine (3 works) · MEDLINE (3 works) · Mental health (3 works) · Clinical Psychology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae