How should patients behave to facilitate shared decision making – the doctors’ view
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19508247 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Johannes Hamann (0000-0002-3861-6017, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie), Rosmarie Mendel (Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie), Markus Bühner (0000-0002-0597-8708, University of Graz), Werner Kissling, Rudolf Cohen (Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie), Eva Knipfer, Hans‐Henning Eckstein (0000-0002-0743-1642, Technical University of Munich) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 360-366 |
| Publication date | 2012-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00682.x |
| PMID | 21624024 |
| OpenAlex | W1560384855 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 18 |
Objective To study how physicians feel about patients’ efforts to be engaged in shared decision making (SDM). Study setting and design Survey of physicians from distinctly different medical disciplines (238 psychiatrists and 169 vascular surgeons). Participants were requested to judge which patient behaviours they find helpful and which behaviours detrimental for SDM. Results Psychiatrists and surgeons had rather positive attitudes about active patient behaviours. However, there were quite a few patient behaviours (e.g. searching the Internet, being assertive towards the doctor) which provoked ambivalent or negative attitudes. Discussion and conclusions Physicians are generally quite open towards active patient behaviour in the consultation. They, however, do consider it as less helpful and become more annoyed if patients insist on their preferences and doubt their doctors’ recommendations. Physicians must realize that SDM implies giving up decisional power and try to be more flexible in their interactions with patients
Data science · Knowledge management · MEDLINE · Political science · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Computer Science · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology
Shared Decision-Making and Role Preference Among Patients With Schizophrenia in Malaysia
Patient-centered psychiatric care for youth in foster care
Experiences of Shared Decision-Making Among Resident Physicians in Taiwan
Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation
Assessments of the extent to which health‐care providers involve patients in decision making
Physical Health Decision-Making Autonomy Preferences for Adults with Severe Mental Illness in Integrated Care
Predictors of Shared Decision Making and Level of Agreement Between Consumers and Providers in Psychiatric Care
Supporting Shared Decision-making for Children’s Complex Behavioral Problems
Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making Commentary
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice
Mutual influence in shared decision making
Difficult Patients” as Family Physicians Perceive Them
Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication
Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students
Gender and the Body of Medicine or at Least Some Body Parts
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,69 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |