Dawid Pieper
Biographic Data
| ID | 7781055 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Dawid Pieper |
| GIVEN NAMES | Dawid |
| FAMILY NAME | Pieper |
| SIGNATURE | PIEPER D |
| AFFILIATIONS | Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0715-5182 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Patient representatives’ perspectives on the centralisation of inpatient healthcare services - A focus group study in Germany
BACKGROUND: Centralisation, i.e. the reorganisation of inpatient healthcare services into fewer specialised units serving a higher volume of patients, affects patients in numerous ways. However, patient representatives' perspectives on centralisation have hardly been explored. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at eliciting patient representatives' perspectives in Germany on the advantages and disadvantages of centralising inpatient healthcare services.…
Recommendations to improve use and dissemination of patient versions of oncological clinical practice guidelines in Germany
The practical recommendations consider various perspectives and can help to improve use and dissemination of oncological PVG in Germany. The inclusion of different stakeholders could facilitate the transfer of the results into practice
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews
Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss wha…
Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews
No prominent works on this page.
Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews
Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss wha…
Recommendations to improve use and dissemination of patient versions of oncological clinical practice guidelines in Germany
The practical recommendations consider various perspectives and can help to improve use and dissemination of oncological PVG in Germany. The inclusion of different stakeholders could facilitate the transfer of the results into practice
Patient representatives’ perspectives on the centralisation of inpatient healthcare services - A focus group study in Germany
BACKGROUND: Centralisation, i.e. the reorganisation of inpatient healthcare services into fewer specialised units serving a higher volume of patients, affects patients in numerous ways. However, patient representatives' perspectives on centralisation have hardly been explored. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at eliciting patient representatives' perspectives in Germany on the advantages and disadvantages of centralising inpatient healthcare services.…
Best practice (2 works) · Health care (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 work) · Centralisation (1 work) · Clinical Practice (1 work) · Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Data extraction (1 work)