Bogdan V Faul
Biographic Data
| ID | 8884654 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Bogdan V Faul |
| GIVEN NAMES | Bogdan V |
| FAMILY NAME | Faul |
| SIGNATURE | FAUL B V |
| AFFILIATIONS | St Petersburg University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-9680-9944 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 8 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The Relational Dimension of the Problem of Evil, and the Mystical Theodicy
Minimal dualism and epistemic approach
In this paper the author presents an argument in favor of minimal dualism — thesis, according to which conscious agents are able to exist without bodies. Author demonstrates the advantages of this argument. Firstly, he shows that this argument is invulnerable to the epistemic strategy of criticizing the conceivability argument. Secondly, the epistemic approach restricts the conceivability of creatures, the possibility of which is incompatible wit…
Physicalism and moral responsibility
In this paper, the author introduces the derivative consequence argument, which aims to demonstrate that moral responsibility is impossible in the world where physicalism and the strong realism about the laws of nature are both true. The basic intuition of the argument is that if the laws of nature determine the events, then nobody can be responsible for those events, because nobody is responsible for the laws of nature. This intuitive idea is fo…
New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
In this paper, I respond to the objections and comments, which are raised by D. Razeev, T. Demin, and M. Sekatskaya. I provide a new formulation of the argument, which avoids all the problems mentioned by these philosophers in their papers and at the conferences
Can God Promise Us a New Past? A Response to Lebens and Goldschmidt
Samuel Lebens and Tyron Goldschmidt provided original theodicies, which suggest that at one time God will change the past, either by erasing/substituting the sins of humans or erasing the whole entirety of evils. Both theodicies imply the idea that God can completely change the past without leaving any traces. In this paper, I argue that Lebens’ and Goldschmidt’s preferred model, which they call the scene-changing theory, is problematic. First, i…
Four-dimensional theories of persistence through time
, . . : , . , , -, , -, .
Dualism in Ontology of Persons and the Thinking Animal Argument
Аргумент мыслящего животного является одним из центральных аргументов в пользу анимализма – взгляда на онтологию личности, огласно которому мы являемся человеческими животными. Данный аргумент оказал большое влияние на дискуссию в онтологии личности, однако его обсуждение было сконцентрировано вокруг метафизического натурализма, с точки зрения которого все факты мира зависят от физических фактов. В современной литературе остается непроясненны…
Peter van Inwagen on free will and time travel
, . , . ,
No prominent works on this page.
Peter van Inwagen on free will and time travel
, . , . ,
Physicalism and moral responsibility
In this paper, the author introduces the derivative consequence argument, which aims to demonstrate that moral responsibility is impossible in the world where physicalism and the strong realism about the laws of nature are both true. The basic intuition of the argument is that if the laws of nature determine the events, then nobody can be responsible for those events, because nobody is responsible for the laws of nature. This intuitive idea is fo…
New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
In this paper, I respond to the objections and comments, which are raised by D. Razeev, T. Demin, and M. Sekatskaya. I provide a new formulation of the argument, which avoids all the problems mentioned by these philosophers in their papers and at the conferences
Can God Promise Us a New Past? A Response to Lebens and Goldschmidt
Samuel Lebens and Tyron Goldschmidt provided original theodicies, which suggest that at one time God will change the past, either by erasing/substituting the sins of humans or erasing the whole entirety of evils. Both theodicies imply the idea that God can completely change the past without leaving any traces. In this paper, I argue that Lebens’ and Goldschmidt’s preferred model, which they call the scene-changing theory, is problematic. First, i…
Four-dimensional theories of persistence through time
, . . : , . , , -, , -, .
Dualism in Ontology of Persons and the Thinking Animal Argument
Аргумент мыслящего животного является одним из центральных аргументов в пользу анимализма – взгляда на онтологию личности, огласно которому мы являемся человеческими животными. Данный аргумент оказал большое влияние на дискуссию в онтологии личности, однако его обсуждение было сконцентрировано вокруг метафизического натурализма, с точки зрения которого все факты мира зависят от физических фактов. В современной литературе остается непроясненны…
The Relational Dimension of the Problem of Evil, and the Mystical Theodicy
Minimal dualism and epistemic approach
In this paper the author presents an argument in favor of minimal dualism — thesis, according to which conscious agents are able to exist without bodies. Author demonstrates the advantages of this argument. Firstly, he shows that this argument is invulnerable to the epistemic strategy of criticizing the conceivability argument. Secondly, the epistemic approach restricts the conceivability of creatures, the possibility of which is incompatible wit…
Epistemology (7 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Metaphysics (3 works) · Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 works) · Chemistry (2 works) · Dualism (2 works) · Free will (2 works)