Noel Struchiner
Biographic Data
| ID | 892645 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Noel Struchiner |
| GIVEN NAMES | Noel |
| FAMILY NAME | Struchiner |
| SIGNATURE | STRUCHINER N |
| AFFILIATIONS | Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6237-9691 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 10 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Purposes in Law and in Life
There has been considerable debate in legal philosophy about how to attribute purposes to rules. Separately, within cognitive science, there has been a growing body of research concerned with questions about how people ordinarily attribute purposes. Here, we argue that these two separate fields might be connected by experimental jurisprudence. Across four studies, we find evidence for the claim that people use the same criteria to attribute purpo…
Moral appraisals guide intuitive legal determinations
OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand how basic competencies in moral reasoning influence the application of private, institutional, and legal rules. HYPOTHESES: We predicted that moral appraisals, implicating both outcome-based and mental state reasoning, would shape participants' interpretation of rules and statutes-and asked whether these effects arise differentially under intuitive and reflective reasoning conditions. METHOD: In six vignette-ba…
Rule is a dual character concept
Do Formalist Judges Abide By Their Abstract Principles? A Two-Country Study in Adjudication
Recent literature in experimental philosophy has postulated the existence of the abstract/concrete paradox (ACP): the tendency to activate inconsistent intuitions (and generate inconsistent judgment) depending on whether a problem to be analyzed is framed in abstract terms or is described as a concrete case. One recent study supports the thesis that this effect influences judicial decision-making, including decision-making by professional judges,…
Legal decision-making and the abstract/concrete paradox
Gender stereotypes underlie child custody decisions
Using hypothetical divorce cases we examine the role of gender stereotypes in decisions about child custody. Good mothers received greater custody allocations than did good fathers across a tightly matched pair of vignettes in three culturally distinct samples: Argentina, Brazil, and the United States (Study 1). Two follow‐up studies indicated that the warmth dimension of stereotype content partly accounted for the asymmetry in custody awards: Th…
Carta dos Editores
A deterministic worldview promotes approval of state paternalism
Aspectos filosóficos e psicológicos das punições
O emprego de sanções é corriqueiro e geralmente associado a uma expectativa de se aumentar a força normativa das regras. Alguns experimentos confirmam essa intuição e indicam que punições fazem com que as pessoas cooperem mais. Filósofos, no entanto, debatem, sem consenso, sobre quais devem ser os propósitos das punições. A despeito da discussão normativa, estudos psicológicos apontam para uma tendência punitiva retributivista no julgamento das p…
O “aparente” paradoxo das regras
O uso de regras prescritivas no campo da fi losofi a prática é abundante, especialmente no campo do direito. O presente artigo pretende fazer uma análise do papel das regras no direito e levantar um aparente paradoxo envolvido na aplicação de regras. Algumas posições possíveis em relação ao paradoxo serão elucidadas
A deterministic worldview promotes approval of state paternalism
Gender stereotypes underlie child custody decisions
Using hypothetical divorce cases we examine the role of gender stereotypes in decisions about child custody. Good mothers received greater custody allocations than did good fathers across a tightly matched pair of vignettes in three culturally distinct samples: Argentina, Brazil, and the United States (Study 1). Two follow‐up studies indicated that the warmth dimension of stereotype content partly accounted for the asymmetry in custody awards: Th…
O “aparente” paradoxo das regras
O uso de regras prescritivas no campo da fi losofi a prática é abundante, especialmente no campo do direito. O presente artigo pretende fazer uma análise do papel das regras no direito e levantar um aparente paradoxo envolvido na aplicação de regras. Algumas posições possíveis em relação ao paradoxo serão elucidadas
Aspectos filosóficos e psicológicos das punições
O emprego de sanções é corriqueiro e geralmente associado a uma expectativa de se aumentar a força normativa das regras. Alguns experimentos confirmam essa intuição e indicam que punições fazem com que as pessoas cooperem mais. Filósofos, no entanto, debatem, sem consenso, sobre quais devem ser os propósitos das punições. A despeito da discussão normativa, estudos psicológicos apontam para uma tendência punitiva retributivista no julgamento das p…
A deterministic worldview promotes approval of state paternalism
Carta dos Editores
Gender stereotypes underlie child custody decisions
Using hypothetical divorce cases we examine the role of gender stereotypes in decisions about child custody. Good mothers received greater custody allocations than did good fathers across a tightly matched pair of vignettes in three culturally distinct samples: Argentina, Brazil, and the United States (Study 1). Two follow‐up studies indicated that the warmth dimension of stereotype content partly accounted for the asymmetry in custody awards: Th…
Legal decision-making and the abstract/concrete paradox
Do Formalist Judges Abide By Their Abstract Principles? A Two-Country Study in Adjudication
Recent literature in experimental philosophy has postulated the existence of the abstract/concrete paradox (ACP): the tendency to activate inconsistent intuitions (and generate inconsistent judgment) depending on whether a problem to be analyzed is framed in abstract terms or is described as a concrete case. One recent study supports the thesis that this effect influences judicial decision-making, including decision-making by professional judges,…
Purposes in Law and in Life
There has been considerable debate in legal philosophy about how to attribute purposes to rules. Separately, within cognitive science, there has been a growing body of research concerned with questions about how people ordinarily attribute purposes. Here, we argue that these two separate fields might be connected by experimental jurisprudence. Across four studies, we find evidence for the claim that people use the same criteria to attribute purpo…
Moral appraisals guide intuitive legal determinations
OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand how basic competencies in moral reasoning influence the application of private, institutional, and legal rules. HYPOTHESES: We predicted that moral appraisals, implicating both outcome-based and mental state reasoning, would shape participants' interpretation of rules and statutes-and asked whether these effects arise differentially under intuitive and reflective reasoning conditions. METHOD: In six vignette-ba…
Rule is a dual character concept
Psychology (8 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 works) · Social Psychology (7 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Political science (4 works) · Free Will and Agency (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Sociology (3 works)