Loes Knaapen
Biographic Data
| ID | 897528 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Loes Knaapen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Loes |
| FAMILY NAME | Knaapen |
| SIGNATURE | KNAAPEN L |
| AFFILIATIONS | McGill University |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3041-4290 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 61 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
Science needs more external evaluation, not less
When science is evaluated by bureaucrats and administrators, it is usually done by quantified performance metrics, for the purpose of economic productivity. Olof Hallonsten criticizes both the means (quantification) and purpose (economization) of such external evaluation. I share the concern that such neoliberal performance metrics are shallow, over-simplified and inaccurate, but differ in how best to oppose this reductionism. Hallonsten proposes…
Three Conceptual Models of Patient and Public Involvement in Standard-setting: From Abstract Principles to Complex Practice
Clinical practice guidelines have been critiqued for prescribing standardized care that neglects patients' personal circumstances and knowledge in health care decisions. To make care more patient centred, standard-setters are urged to involve patients and the public in guideline development and use. Despite widespread principled support for such Patient and Public Involvement (PPI), the underlying principles guiding PPI in standardization of care…
Evidence‐Based Medicine or Cookbook Medicine? Addressing Concerns over the Standardization of Care
Evidence‐based medicine (EBM), which advocates clinical decisions are based on evidence from medical research, has become an important ideal pursued in contemporary medicine. EBM relies on two key principles: the evidence hierarchy and clinical practice guidelines. Both principles have been fiercely criticized, and critics often invoke the term ‘Cookbook medicine’ to stress the dangers and limitations of EBM. This article reviews diverse critical…
Being ‘evidence-based’ in the absence of evidence: The management of non-evidence in guideline development
Since the emergence of the Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) movement, the nature and role of evidence in medicine has been much debated. The formal classification of evidence that is unique to Evidence-Based Medicine, referred to as the Evidence hierarchy, has been fiercely criticized. Yet studies that examine how Evidence is classified in EBM practice are rare. This article presents an observational study of the nature of Evidence and Evidence-Base…
Pragmatic evidence and textual arrangements: A case study of French clinical cancer guidelines
Diagnosing and treating premenstrual syndrome in five western nations
The biomedical standardization of premenstrual syndrome
Being ‘evidence-based’ in the absence of evidence: The management of non-evidence in guideline development
Since the emergence of the Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) movement, the nature and role of evidence in medicine has been much debated. The formal classification of evidence that is unique to Evidence-Based Medicine, referred to as the Evidence hierarchy, has been fiercely criticized. Yet studies that examine how Evidence is classified in EBM practice are rare. This article presents an observational study of the nature of Evidence and Evidence-Base…
Pragmatic evidence and textual arrangements: A case study of French clinical cancer guidelines
Evidence‐Based Medicine or Cookbook Medicine? Addressing Concerns over the Standardization of Care
Evidence‐based medicine (EBM), which advocates clinical decisions are based on evidence from medical research, has become an important ideal pursued in contemporary medicine. EBM relies on two key principles: the evidence hierarchy and clinical practice guidelines. Both principles have been fiercely criticized, and critics often invoke the term ‘Cookbook medicine’ to stress the dangers and limitations of EBM. This article reviews diverse critical…
The biomedical standardization of premenstrual syndrome
Three Conceptual Models of Patient and Public Involvement in Standard-setting: From Abstract Principles to Complex Practice
Clinical practice guidelines have been critiqued for prescribing standardized care that neglects patients' personal circumstances and knowledge in health care decisions. To make care more patient centred, standard-setters are urged to involve patients and the public in guideline development and use. Despite widespread principled support for such Patient and Public Involvement (PPI), the underlying principles guiding PPI in standardization of care…
Science needs more external evaluation, not less
When science is evaluated by bureaucrats and administrators, it is usually done by quantified performance metrics, for the purpose of economic productivity. Olof Hallonsten criticizes both the means (quantification) and purpose (economization) of such external evaluation. I share the concern that such neoliberal performance metrics are shallow, over-simplified and inaccurate, but differ in how best to oppose this reductionism. Hallonsten proposes…
Diagnosing and treating premenstrual syndrome in five western nations
The biomedical standardization of premenstrual syndrome
Diagnosing and treating premenstrual syndrome in five western nations
Pragmatic evidence and textual arrangements: A case study of French clinical cancer guidelines
Being ‘evidence-based’ in the absence of evidence: The management of non-evidence in guideline development
Since the emergence of the Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) movement, the nature and role of evidence in medicine has been much debated. The formal classification of evidence that is unique to Evidence-Based Medicine, referred to as the Evidence hierarchy, has been fiercely criticized. Yet studies that examine how Evidence is classified in EBM practice are rare. This article presents an observational study of the nature of Evidence and Evidence-Base…
Evidence‐Based Medicine or Cookbook Medicine? Addressing Concerns over the Standardization of Care
Evidence‐based medicine (EBM), which advocates clinical decisions are based on evidence from medical research, has become an important ideal pursued in contemporary medicine. EBM relies on two key principles: the evidence hierarchy and clinical practice guidelines. Both principles have been fiercely criticized, and critics often invoke the term ‘Cookbook medicine’ to stress the dangers and limitations of EBM. This article reviews diverse critical…
Three Conceptual Models of Patient and Public Involvement in Standard-setting: From Abstract Principles to Complex Practice
Clinical practice guidelines have been critiqued for prescribing standardized care that neglects patients' personal circumstances and knowledge in health care decisions. To make care more patient centred, standard-setters are urged to involve patients and the public in guideline development and use. Despite widespread principled support for such Patient and Public Involvement (PPI), the underlying principles guiding PPI in standardization of care…
Science needs more external evaluation, not less
When science is evaluated by bureaucrats and administrators, it is usually done by quantified performance metrics, for the purpose of economic productivity. Olof Hallonsten criticizes both the means (quantification) and purpose (economization) of such external evaluation. I share the concern that such neoliberal performance metrics are shallow, over-simplified and inaccurate, but differ in how best to oppose this reductionism. Hallonsten proposes…
Political science (7 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Medicine (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 works) · Guideline (3 works) · Public relations (3 works) · Sociology (3 works)