Matthew J Delhey
Biographic Data
| ID | 9024331 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Matthew J Delhey |
| GIVEN NAMES | Matthew J |
| FAMILY NAME | Delhey |
| SIGNATURE | DELHEY M J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Toronto |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8745-6761 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Apriorism and Scientific Cooperation in Hegel
Hegel’s commentators often attribute to his system some form of apriorism, the view that the system’s content or its justification (or both) are independent of experience and empirical science. In this article, I argue that apriorism conflicts with Hegel’s commitment to cooperation between philosophy and empirical science, as outlined in §§1–18 of the 1830 Encyclopaedia . I do so by attributing two theses to Hegel: scientific cooperation —that kn…
Schelling’s Metametaphysical Critique of Hegel
This article defends Hegel against Schelling’s critique that his system can only comprehend actuality but cannot explain it. It does so while granting Schelling’s his basic premise, namely, that Hegel’s system is entirely logical. Hegel’s account of comprehension effectively answers Schelling’s ‘despairing’ question: why is there something rather than nothing? In the first part, I reconstruct Schelling’s critique, showing that he takes Hegel’s sy…
No prominent works on this page.
Schelling’s Metametaphysical Critique of Hegel
This article defends Hegel against Schelling’s critique that his system can only comprehend actuality but cannot explain it. It does so while granting Schelling’s his basic premise, namely, that Hegel’s system is entirely logical. Hegel’s account of comprehension effectively answers Schelling’s ‘despairing’ question: why is there something rather than nothing? In the first part, I reconstruct Schelling’s critique, showing that he takes Hegel’s sy…
Apriorism and Scientific Cooperation in Hegel
Hegel’s commentators often attribute to his system some form of apriorism, the view that the system’s content or its justification (or both) are independent of experience and empirical science. In this article, I argue that apriorism conflicts with Hegel’s commitment to cooperation between philosophy and empirical science, as outlined in §§1–18 of the 1830 Encyclopaedia . I do so by attributing two theses to Hegel: scientific cooperation —that kn…
Epistemology (2 works) · Hegelianism (2 works) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 work) · Philosophy and Historical Thought (1 work) · Philosophy, Science, and History (1 work) · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (1 work)