Gülşen Bağcı Kılıç
Biographic Data
| ID | 9103524 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Gülşen Bağcı Kılıç |
| GIVEN NAMES | Gülşen Bağcı |
| FAMILY NAME | Kılıç |
| SIGNATURE | KILIC G B |
| AFFILIATIONS | Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Assessing the reliability of self‐ and peer rating in student group work
Peer and self‐ratings have been strongly recommended as the means to adjust individual contributions to group work. To evaluate the quality of student ratings, previous research has primarily explored the validity of these ratings, as indicated by the degree of agreement between student and teacher ratings. This research describes a Generalizability Theory framework to evaluate the reliability of student ratings in terms of the degree of consiste…
The analysis of the impact of individual weighting factor on individual scores
In this study, category‐based self and peer assessment were applied twice in a semester in an Elementary Science Teaching Methods course in order to assess individual contributions of group members to group projects as well as to analyze the impact of Individual Weighting Factors (IWF) on individual scores and individual grades. IWF were calculated by applying Conway et al.'s (1993 Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A. and Wu, M. 1993. Peer‐assessmen…
No prominent works on this page.
The analysis of the impact of individual weighting factor on individual scores
In this study, category‐based self and peer assessment were applied twice in a semester in an Elementary Science Teaching Methods course in order to assess individual contributions of group members to group projects as well as to analyze the impact of Individual Weighting Factors (IWF) on individual scores and individual grades. IWF were calculated by applying Conway et al.'s (1993 Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A. and Wu, M. 1993. Peer‐assessmen…
Assessing the reliability of self‐ and peer rating in student group work
Peer and self‐ratings have been strongly recommended as the means to adjust individual contributions to group work. To evaluate the quality of student ratings, previous research has primarily explored the validity of these ratings, as indicated by the degree of agreement between student and teacher ratings. This research describes a Generalizability Theory framework to evaluate the reliability of student ratings in terms of the degree of consiste…
Higher education (2 works) · Mathematics education (2 works) · Peer Assessment (2 works) · Peer evaluation (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Student Assessment and Feedback (2 works) · Applied Psychology (1 work) · Chemistry (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Developmental psychology (1 work)