The analysis of the impact of individual weighting factor on individual scores
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19379667 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gulsen Bagci Kilic (Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University), Gülşen Bağcı Kılıç (Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, corresponding author), Mehtap Cakan (0000-0001-6602-6180, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 639-654 |
| Publication date | 2006-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02602930600760843 |
| OpenAlex | W2008568932 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 13 |
In this study, category‐based self and peer assessment were applied twice in a semester in an Elementary Science Teaching Methods course in order to assess individual contributions of group members to group projects as well as to analyze the impact of Individual Weighting Factors (IWF) on individual scores and individual grades. IWF were calculated by applying Conway et al.'s (1993 Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A. and Wu, M. 1993. Peer‐assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1): 45–54. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) formula. The resulting individual scores were analyzed to find out the impact of IWF on individual scores and individual grades. It was found that the differentiation of individual scores was very large in both applications and caused dramatic changes in some of the students' grades. For this reason, the IWF had to be scaled down to decrease its effect on individual grades. After scaling down the IWF, more acceptable distribution of student grades was obtained
Higher education · Mathematics education · Peer Assessment · Peer evaluation · Raw score · Statistics · Weighting · Chemistry · Engineering Education and Curriculum Development · Mathematics · Medicine · Problem and Project Based Learning · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
Assessing the reliability of self‐ and peer rating in student group work
Collaborating or fighting for the marks? Students’ experiences of group work assessment in the creative arts
A robust approach for mapping group marks to individual marks using peer assessment
Peer assessment accounting for student agreement
The Effect of the Inclusion of Selfassessment with Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project
Examining Student Satisfaction with Group Projects and Peer Assessment
Peer Assessment of an Individual ‘s Contribution to a Group Project
Enhancing student performance through cooperative learning in physical sciences
A Survey of Methods of Deriving Individual Grades from Group Assessments
Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project
Some Refinements on Peer Assessment of Group Projects
Further Developments in Peer Assessment of Group Projects
Peer Assessment of Group Projects in Civil Engineering
Reciprocity as a Source of Bias in Multiple Peer Assessment of Group Work
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.22 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2015 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |