Some Refinements on Peer Assessment of Group Projects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19378568 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lawrence K Y Li, K Y Li (0000-0002-9442-5303, City University of Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 5-18 |
| Publication date | 2001-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0260293002002255 |
| OpenAlex | W2111472098 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 9 |
As the demand for group projects in higher education has increased in recent years, it is necessary to device an assessment method that results in fair grading of project group members. An attempt has been made to apply an existing peer assessment approach from Goldfinch to engineering student group projects. The results confirm the validity of the approach. However, the existing approach has a number of problems owing to the inevitable bias introduced by individual students during the peer assessment process. A new normalisation process is introduced to iron out the inherent shortcomings of the existing peer assessment method. The experience gained so far has led us to believe that this peer assessment method with normalisation can be used as a tool to assess individual marks of a group project
Civil engineering · Engineering management · Evaluation methods · Higher education · Mathematics education · Peer Assessment · Peer evaluation · Peer group · Peer review · Political science · Reliability engineering · Computer Science · Educational Robotics and Engineering · Engineering · Engineering Education and Curriculum Development · Law · Problem and Project Based Learning · Psychology · Social Psychology
Attitudes towards being assessed in group work
Understanding Chinese university student conceptions of assessment
The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self- and peer-assessment
Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork
The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment
Unfolding collaborative learning assessment literacy
The Effect of the Inclusion of Selfassessment with Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project
The analysis of the impact of individual weighting factor on individual scores
Enhancing student performance through cooperative learning in physical sciences
A comparative study of effectiveness of peer assessment of individuals’ contributions to group projects in undergraduate construction management core units
A robust approach for mapping group marks to individual marks using peer assessment
An approach to assign individual marks from a team mark
Moderation of peer assessment in group projects
Do peer assessment ratings reflect individual contributions? Validity evidence from multicultural student teams
Using the method of normalisation for mapping group marks to individual marks
Monte Carlo evaluations of methods of grade distribution in group projects
Group Projects for First-year University Students
Development of a Peer Assessment Technique for Obtaining Individual Marks on a Group Project
Peer Assessment of an Individual ‘s Contribution to a Group Project
Staff and Peer Assessment ‐ Measuring an Individual's Contribution to Group Performance
A Survey of Methods of Deriving Individual Grades from Group Assessments
Peer Assessment by Groups of Group Work
Further Developments in Peer Assessment of Group Projects
Peer Assessment of Group Projects in Civil Engineering
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.64 |
| Citation span | 2001 - 2026 (26) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |