Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Моsin

Biographic Data

ID915761
NAMEМоsin
FAMILY NAMEМоsin
SIGNATUREМОSIN
AFFILIATIONSInstitute of History and Archaeology
ORCID0000-0002-5936-3266
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS9
AUTHOR COUNT10
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • Social & Cultural Space in the Mesolithic and Neolithic Trans-Urals

    Open Access•Моsin•ARTICLE•Уфимский археологический вестник•2025

    The concept of social & cultural space is basic for archaeology, as it integrates the concepts of physical and social systems, social needs reflected in the tangible culture and time. This article aims to define the criteria and to consider the origins of the social & cultural space in the Neolithic Trans-Urals. The Mesolithic and Neolithic Trans-Urals stand out with technological and cultural peculiarities. These peculiarities list siliceous raw…

  • Chronology of the Eneolithic Sites of the Forest Trans-Urals

    Open Access•Моsin•ARTICLE•Vestnik NSU Series History and…•2023•References: 1

    Purpose. At the end of the 20 th – beginning of the 21 st century, a generalization of all radiocarbon dates available at that time for the Eneolithic of the Trans-Urals forest and forest-steppe zone was carried out. Two stages were allocated – early and late, within the second half of the 5 th – 4 th millennium BC. However, an analysis of the differences be-tween the chronology of sites in the forest and forest-steppe zones was not carried out. …

  • Stone equipment of the Poludensky complex of the Kedrovy Mys-1 site

    Open Access•N Skochina, Моsin•ARTICLE•Vestnik arheologii, antropologii…•2021•References: 5

    The paper deals with the complex analysis of the stone equipment of the Kedrovy Mys-1 site associated with the Poludensky tradition, classical for the Trans-Urals, dated to the Late Neolithic period. On the basis of typologi-cal and functional analyses, aimed at the study of tool shapes and identification of their correlation with the func-tional purpose, specifics of the stone industry of the Poludensky complex have been determined. The tools ma…

  • Complexes with Flat-Bottomed Ceramics in the Neolithic from the Don to the Irtysh

    Open Access•Моsin•ARTICLE•Vestnik NSU Series History and…•2020

    Purpose. The aim of the work is to analyze the chronology of Neolithic complexes containing flat-bottomed ceramics in the European part of Russia and the Ural-Siberian region, as well as an attempt to highlight patterns in the development of Neolithic Ural-Siberian cultural traditions amidst complexes with flat-bottomed ceramics of the Volga region. Results. Researches of Baraba culture of the early Neolithic of Western Siberia: Tartas-1, Ust-Tar…

  • Neolithic and eneolithic complexes of site Kedroviy mys-1 in South Trans-Urals

    Open Access•Моsin, A Strahov•ARTICLE•Bulletin of the South Ural State…•2017

    The article presents the results of the study of the site Kedrovy Mys-1 on Lake Maloe Miassovo in the Southern Trans-Urals. The site, which was a place of not long-term inhabitation of the ancient population, was fully investigated. The site was inhabited in the Neo-Eneolithic and Early Iron Age; below in the work are published materials of the Stone Age, significantly prevailing in the collection. Despite the poor preservation of ceramics, it wa…

  • New Absolute Dates for the Trans-Uralian and Western Siberian Neolithic

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2017•Cited by: 1

    This article deals with the absolute chronology of the Neolithic cultures of the eastern Ural, Middle Irtysh-Baraba, and the Upper Ob basin. Twenty-two new radiocarbon dates for the ceramic assemblages of Trans-Uralian Neolithic and thirteen for those of the western Siberian forest-steppe suggest that Kozlov Mys, Poludenka, and Boborykino sites in the forest-steppe coexisted with those of the Makhandzhar type in eastern Ural and Kazakhstan during…

  • Geochemical Soil Analysis and Environmental Reconstructions at the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Settlement Kochegarovo-1 in the Forest-Steppe Zone of Western Siberia

    Open Access•L R Bikmulina, Л Р Бикмулина et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2017

    The article outlines the results of the analysis of cultural layers and natural soil horizons at the Neolithic and Chalcolithic settlement Kochegarovo-1, and of the modern soil in its vicinities. The distribution of chemical elements and the associated geochemical ratios in the archaeological profile were compared to the background values. Six chemical elements (phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, manganese, and strontium) form distinct co…

  • Chronology of the Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze Age in the Urals1

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2014•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    Sociocultural processes in the Uralian Chalcolithic were determined both by the evolutionary changes in the local post-Neolithic societies and by the migratory activity of the southern human groups, which fact makes the cultural and historical analysis of archeological records problematic. Until recently, the chronology and periodization of the Uralian Chalcolithic were based mainly on stratigraphy, artifacts typology, and intuition. In the artic…

  • Chronology of the Uralian Neolithic1

    Open Access•A A Vybornov, Моsin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2014•Cited by: 4•References: 3

    Until the early 2000s, the chronology of the Uralian Neolithic was based on isolated radiocarbon dates and on V.N. Chernetsov's and O.N. Bahder's typological schemes. In 2007 we began directly dating ceramics tempered with organic substances. As a result, a long series of reliable dates was generated. A total of 212 estimates has been analyzed, spanning various Neolithic cultures of the Urals. The entire period lasted from the late 7th to the lat…

  • Siliceous Rock of the Southern Urals

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2010•Cited by: 2

    Relationships between the distribution of stone tools, the sources of siliceous rocks, and the geological structure of the Southern Urals are examined. Siliceous rocks mostly used by the Stone Age population of that region include phtanite, phtanitoid, jasper, novaculite, and also minerals such as quartz, opal, and chalcedony. Siliceous rocks are mostly concentrated in the eugeosynclinal region of the Urals, primarily within the Magnitogorsk stru…

  • Chronology of the Uralian Neolithic1

    Open Access•A A Vybornov, Моsin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2014•Cited by: 4•References: 3

    Until the early 2000s, the chronology of the Uralian Neolithic was based on isolated radiocarbon dates and on V.N. Chernetsov's and O.N. Bahder's typological schemes. In 2007 we began directly dating ceramics tempered with organic substances. As a result, a long series of reliable dates was generated. A total of 212 estimates has been analyzed, spanning various Neolithic cultures of the Urals. The entire period lasted from the late 7th to the lat…

  • Chronology of the Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze Age in the Urals1

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2014•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    Sociocultural processes in the Uralian Chalcolithic were determined both by the evolutionary changes in the local post-Neolithic societies and by the migratory activity of the southern human groups, which fact makes the cultural and historical analysis of archeological records problematic. Until recently, the chronology and periodization of the Uralian Chalcolithic were based mainly on stratigraphy, artifacts typology, and intuition. In the artic…

  • Siliceous Rock of the Southern Urals

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2010•Cited by: 2

    Relationships between the distribution of stone tools, the sources of siliceous rocks, and the geological structure of the Southern Urals are examined. Siliceous rocks mostly used by the Stone Age population of that region include phtanite, phtanitoid, jasper, novaculite, and also minerals such as quartz, opal, and chalcedony. Siliceous rocks are mostly concentrated in the eugeosynclinal region of the Urals, primarily within the Magnitogorsk stru…

  • New Absolute Dates for the Trans-Uralian and Western Siberian Neolithic

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2017•Cited by: 1

    This article deals with the absolute chronology of the Neolithic cultures of the eastern Ural, Middle Irtysh-Baraba, and the Upper Ob basin. Twenty-two new radiocarbon dates for the ceramic assemblages of Trans-Uralian Neolithic and thirteen for those of the western Siberian forest-steppe suggest that Kozlov Mys, Poludenka, and Boborykino sites in the forest-steppe coexisted with those of the Makhandzhar type in eastern Ural and Kazakhstan during…

  • Siliceous Rock of the Southern Urals

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2010•Cited by: 2

    Relationships between the distribution of stone tools, the sources of siliceous rocks, and the geological structure of the Southern Urals are examined. Siliceous rocks mostly used by the Stone Age population of that region include phtanite, phtanitoid, jasper, novaculite, and also minerals such as quartz, opal, and chalcedony. Siliceous rocks are mostly concentrated in the eugeosynclinal region of the Urals, primarily within the Magnitogorsk stru…

  • Chronology of the Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze Age in the Urals1

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2014•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    Sociocultural processes in the Uralian Chalcolithic were determined both by the evolutionary changes in the local post-Neolithic societies and by the migratory activity of the southern human groups, which fact makes the cultural and historical analysis of archeological records problematic. Until recently, the chronology and periodization of the Uralian Chalcolithic were based mainly on stratigraphy, artifacts typology, and intuition. In the artic…

  • Chronology of the Uralian Neolithic1

    Open Access•A A Vybornov, Моsin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2014•Cited by: 4•References: 3

    Until the early 2000s, the chronology of the Uralian Neolithic was based on isolated radiocarbon dates and on V.N. Chernetsov's and O.N. Bahder's typological schemes. In 2007 we began directly dating ceramics tempered with organic substances. As a result, a long series of reliable dates was generated. A total of 212 estimates has been analyzed, spanning various Neolithic cultures of the Urals. The entire period lasted from the late 7th to the lat…

  • Neolithic and eneolithic complexes of site Kedroviy mys-1 in South Trans-Urals

    Open Access•Моsin, A Strahov•ARTICLE•Bulletin of the South Ural State…•2017

    The article presents the results of the study of the site Kedrovy Mys-1 on Lake Maloe Miassovo in the Southern Trans-Urals. The site, which was a place of not long-term inhabitation of the ancient population, was fully investigated. The site was inhabited in the Neo-Eneolithic and Early Iron Age; below in the work are published materials of the Stone Age, significantly prevailing in the collection. Despite the poor preservation of ceramics, it wa…

  • New Absolute Dates for the Trans-Uralian and Western Siberian Neolithic

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2017•Cited by: 1

    This article deals with the absolute chronology of the Neolithic cultures of the eastern Ural, Middle Irtysh-Baraba, and the Upper Ob basin. Twenty-two new radiocarbon dates for the ceramic assemblages of Trans-Uralian Neolithic and thirteen for those of the western Siberian forest-steppe suggest that Kozlov Mys, Poludenka, and Boborykino sites in the forest-steppe coexisted with those of the Makhandzhar type in eastern Ural and Kazakhstan during…

  • Geochemical Soil Analysis and Environmental Reconstructions at the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Settlement Kochegarovo-1 in the Forest-Steppe Zone of Western Siberia

    Open Access•L R Bikmulina, Л Р Бикмулина et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2017

    The article outlines the results of the analysis of cultural layers and natural soil horizons at the Neolithic and Chalcolithic settlement Kochegarovo-1, and of the modern soil in its vicinities. The distribution of chemical elements and the associated geochemical ratios in the archaeological profile were compared to the background values. Six chemical elements (phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, manganese, and strontium) form distinct co…

  • Complexes with Flat-Bottomed Ceramics in the Neolithic from the Don to the Irtysh

    Open Access•Моsin•ARTICLE•Vestnik NSU Series History and…•2020

    Purpose. The aim of the work is to analyze the chronology of Neolithic complexes containing flat-bottomed ceramics in the European part of Russia and the Ural-Siberian region, as well as an attempt to highlight patterns in the development of Neolithic Ural-Siberian cultural traditions amidst complexes with flat-bottomed ceramics of the Volga region. Results. Researches of Baraba culture of the early Neolithic of Western Siberia: Tartas-1, Ust-Tar…

  • Stone equipment of the Poludensky complex of the Kedrovy Mys-1 site

    Open Access•N Skochina, Моsin•ARTICLE•Vestnik arheologii, antropologii…•2021•References: 5

    The paper deals with the complex analysis of the stone equipment of the Kedrovy Mys-1 site associated with the Poludensky tradition, classical for the Trans-Urals, dated to the Late Neolithic period. On the basis of typologi-cal and functional analyses, aimed at the study of tool shapes and identification of their correlation with the func-tional purpose, specifics of the stone industry of the Poludensky complex have been determined. The tools ma…

  • Chronology of the Eneolithic Sites of the Forest Trans-Urals

    Open Access•Моsin•ARTICLE•Vestnik NSU Series History and…•2023•References: 1

    Purpose. At the end of the 20 th – beginning of the 21 st century, a generalization of all radiocarbon dates available at that time for the Eneolithic of the Trans-Urals forest and forest-steppe zone was carried out. Two stages were allocated – early and late, within the second half of the 5 th – 4 th millennium BC. However, an analysis of the differences be-tween the chronology of sites in the forest and forest-steppe zones was not carried out. …

  • Social & Cultural Space in the Mesolithic and Neolithic Trans-Urals

    Open Access•Моsin•ARTICLE•Уфимский археологический вестник•2025

    The concept of social & cultural space is basic for archaeology, as it integrates the concepts of physical and social systems, social needs reflected in the tangible culture and time. This article aims to define the criteria and to consider the origins of the social & cultural space in the Neolithic Trans-Urals. The Mesolithic and Neolithic Trans-Urals stand out with technological and cultural peculiarities. These peculiarities list siliceous raw…

Archaeology (9 works) · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (9 works) · Geography (9 works) · Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (8 works) · Geology (6 works) · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (6 works) · Chronology (5 works) · Ancient history (4 works) · Bronze Age (4 works) · Chalcolithic (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae